✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount

SleekRank for Supreme Court case pages

Maintain a database of SCOTUS opinions with citation, holding, and vote split. SleekRank reads each row and publishes one indexable WordPress page per case at /scotus/{slug}/ with parties, holding, majority opinion, and a case OG card driven by the data.

€50 off for the first 100 lifetime licenses!

SleekRank for Supreme Court case pages

Lawyers want exact citations and holdings, not loose case summaries

A lawyer pulling up Brown v. Board wants the citation (347 U.S. 483), the date (May 17, 1954), the holding, the vote split (9-0), the majority author (Chief Justice Warren), and the cases overruled (Plessy v. Ferguson). Loose blog posts that summarize a doctrinal area never serve the long tail of legal research queries. Around 28,000 SCOTUS decisions each deserve their own focused page with the same field set filled in every time.

SleekRank treats the SCOTUS database as the source of truth. Columns for slug, case_name, citation, argued_date, decided_date, holding, vote, and majority_author feed one base page at /scotus/{slug}/. The data flows into the right cells, the JSON-LD picks up the same fields, and the justice-level pages aggregate from the majority_author column automatically.

Tag mappings carry the headings, selector mappings fill the case infobox, list mappings render the cases cited and overruled, and a meta mapping wires the OG image. When a new term ends, you add the term's decisions as new rows. When a later case overrules an older one, you update one cell in both rows.

Workflow

From case row to indexable SCOTUS digest

1

Build the base case page

Design one WordPress page with hero, case infobox, holding block, reasoning summary, vote breakdown, cited cases list, cases overruled list, and an opinion link block. The base page lives at the URL template and every case inherits its layout from the same template.
2

Structure the case sheet

Columns for slug, case name, citation, argued and decided dates, holding, vote, majority author, concurrences and dissents arrays, cited cases array, opinion URL, and image URL. Around 28,000 rows cover the full SCOTUS catalog from 1791 to the current term.
3

Wire mappings to the template

Tag mapping for the title and H1, selector mappings for the infobox cells, list mappings for cited and overruled cases, meta mapping for the OG image. The same row fills every block, so the layout stays consistent across the corpus of opinions from every era.
4

Cluster by doctrine and term

Use doctrine and term columns to drive related-page lists at the bottom of each page. A list mapping filters the sheet by doctrine and renders six related cases per page, deterministically ordered by decided_date so the doctrinal sequence stays clear to the reader.

Data in, pages out

Each case is one row, the rest is template

Columns for citation, decided date, holding, vote, majority author. Tag and selector mappings populate the page; list mappings render the cited and overruled cases.
Data source: SCOTUS database / U.S. Reports
slug case_name citation decided_date vote
brown-v-board-of-education Brown v. Board of Education 347 U.S. 483 1954-05-17 9-0
marbury-v-madison Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. 137 1803-02-24 4-0
miranda-v-arizona Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 1966-06-13 5-4
roe-v-wade Roe v. Wade 410 U.S. 113 1973-01-22 7-2
citizens-united-v-fec Citizens United v. FEC 558 U.S. 310 2010-01-21 5-4
URL pattern: /scotus/{slug}/
Generated pages
  • /scotus/brown-v-board-of-education/
  • /scotus/marbury-v-madison/
  • /scotus/miranda-v-arizona/
  • /scotus/roe-v-wade/
  • /scotus/citizens-united-v-fec/

Comparison

Per-case blog posts vs SleekRank

Hand-written case posts

  • Each case is a manual post, written and laid out from scratch
  • Citation formats drift between posts and miss Bluebook style
  • Updates after later cases overrule a precedent touch each post by hand
  • Cross-links between cases citing each other stay manual
  • OG card and schema have to be set on every post separately
  • Growing past around 500 cases becomes an editorial burden

SleekRank

  • One row per case fills /scotus/{slug}/ automatically
  • Selector mappings render the case infobox from columns
  • List mappings render the cases cited and the cases overruled
  • Tag mapping carries case name into the page title and H1
  • OG card auto-managed via meta mapping to og:image
  • Around 28,000 SCOTUS cases become around 28,000 indexable URLs from one template

Features

What SleekRank gives you for Supreme Court case pages

Case infobox fields

Citation, argued and decided dates, term, lower court, vote split, majority author, and concurring or dissenting justices each land in their own cell via selector mappings. The structure stays uniform across the corpus so lawyers know where to find any fact for any case in the catalog.

Cited and overruled cases

Store cited cases and overruled cases as JSON array columns of slugs. The list mapping renders internal links to those case pages, so the citation web builds itself from the data. When a later case overrules an older precedent, you update both rows and the relationship goes live.

Holding and reasoning blocks

Holding, reasoning summary, and key passages each render as labeled sections. Long passages live in a quotes column that supports markdown blockquotes. Lawyers get a clean digest that surfaces the operative holding without scrolling through full slip opinions on every visit.

Use cases

Who runs SCOTUS case libraries on SleekRank

Law firms and bar associations

Publish an internal-facing or public-facing case digest library. Each case carries the same fields, the practice-area pages link into the catalog, and the corpus grows as new opinions issue, with daily syncs catching new decisions during the SCOTUS term.

Law schools and CLE providers

Provide students and practitioners with a consistent case reference for casebooks and CLE materials. The same sheet that drives course syllabi feeds the public case pages, kept in sync without parallel edits and with citations linked to the full opinions.

Legal media and court watchers

Run case explainers and term recaps off one shared database. SCOTUSblog-style coverage benefits from a uniform digest page per case, and the editorial team can focus on argument analysis instead of repeatedly typing the same infobox fields for every new decision.

The bigger picture

Why SCOTUS doctrine rewards depth at scale

Lawyers cite before they brief. A practitioner working on a First Amendment claim wants the holding in Citizens United, the cases it cited, the cases it overruled, and the vote split with concurring opinions broken out. They do not want a six-paragraph blog post that mixes a dozen campaign finance decisions under one heading.

The sites that win in this niche publish one focused page per case and keep the citation web current. Doing that by hand across 28,000 SCOTUS decisions is decades of editorial work. Doing it from a sheet is one law librarian editor and one weekend of template work.

The structured approach also pays back on long-tail search. Queries like vote split in Miranda v. Arizona, or cases overruled by Dobbs, land on pages that already carry that exact field.

New decisions are the other reason to keep this corpus data-driven. Each term adds 60 to 70 new opinions, and a single sheet append publishes the term's cases as soon as they issue, instead of triggering 60 fresh post-creation tickets in the editorial queue.

Questions

Common questions about SleekRank for Supreme Court case pages

Yes. Add columns for plurality_author, concurrences as a JSON array, and dissents as a JSON array. Conditional sections render plurality blocks only when the column is non-empty, and the concurrence and dissent lists show one author and key holding per opinion. The infobox stays clean even when a case has six separate opinions.

 

Each case row has an overruled_by column that holds the slug of the later case. A conditional banner renders on overruled cases linking to the later opinion, and the later case lists the overruled precedent in its cases-overruled section. The bidirectional link stays in sync because both ends read from the same sheet.

 

Use an overruled_status column with values like fully overruled, partially overruled, or limited. Different banners render for each status, with the specific holdings overruled listed beneath the banner. Lawyers see at a glance which doctrines still survive and which have been narrowed by later opinions.

 

Yes. The majority_author column accepts a justice name or the value per curiam. Conditional rendering hides the author block on per curiam decisions and shows a per curiam label instead. Shadow docket orders fit the same pattern, with a separate banner indicating shadow docket origin and limited briefing.

 

An opinion_url column per row points at the official slip opinion on the Supreme Court website or to bound U.S. Reports volumes hosted by the Court. The page renders a prominent Read the full opinion link, and the page can also embed the official syllabus when a syllabus_text column is populated for that case.

 

Schema.org has no dedicated Case type, so the page uses Article with extra JSON-LD additions for citation, holding, and majority author. Search engines treat the page as a rich legal article, and the custom JSON-LD gives Westlaw, Lexis, and other downstream pipelines clean access to the structured case metadata.

 

The page is static, but a structured submission form can feed a moderated practitioner_notes column. Approved notes render under a Practitioner commentary heading via a list mapping with author attribution and firm affiliation. Editorial control stays with the sheet owner who vets submissions before publication.

 

Because every page is built from a unique row, visible content varies by case. Doctrinal context comes from case-specific holdings, not a shared paragraph. Schedule a quarterly review of any columns that risk repetition (generic doctrine summaries, boilerplate procedural posture sentences) and tighten them at the data layer.

 

Pricing

More than 1000+
happy customers

Explore our flexible licensing options tailored to your needs. Upgrade your license anytime to access more features, or opt for a lifetime license for ongoing value, including lifetime updates and lifetime support. Our hassle-free upgrade process ensures that our platform can grow with you, starting from whichever plan you choose.

Starter

€99

EUR

per year

Get started

further 30% launch-discount applied during checkout for existing customers.

  • 3 websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Pro

€179

EUR

per year

Get started

further 30% launch-discount applied during checkout for existing customers.

  • Unlimited websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Lifetime ♾️

Launch Offer

€299

€249

EUR

once

Get started

further 30% launch-discount applied during checkout for existing customers.

  • Unlimited websites
  • Lifetime updates
  • Lifetime support

...or get the Bundle Deal
and save €250 🎁

The Bundle (unlimited sites)

Pay once, own it forever

Elevate your WordPress site with our exclusive plugin bundle that includes all of our premium plugins in one package. Enjoy lifetime updates and lifetime support. Save significantly compared to buying plugins individually.

What’s included

  • SleekAI

  • SleekByte

  • SleekMotion

  • SleekPixel

  • SleekRank

  • SleekView