The Canny alternative for feedback boards built inside WordPress
Canny is the long-running SaaS feedback platform for product teams: hosted boards, roadmaps, changelogs, and integrations. SleekView keeps the feedback workflow inside WordPress with ideas as CPTs, votes as meta fields, and no per-user pricing.
♾️ Lifetime License available
Feedback boards inside WordPress, not on canny.io
Canny is one of the most established feedback-management SaaS products, popular with product-led growth companies for its public boards, roadmap, changelog, and integrations with PM tools (Jira, Linear, Asana). Teams typically host their feedback on a Canny subdomain (feedback.yourcompany.com) or embed it on their site through a script. The data lives in Canny's database and is accessed through its API, with SSO bridging users from the company's own system.
SleekView positions itself as a different shape of answer for WordPress sites. The feedback board is a view over a CPT: ideas are posts in WordPress, statuses are a taxonomy or ACF field, votes are a meta field on the post, and the same CPT renders as a kanban for the team or a sortable table for reporting. The board is a shortcode or block, not a third-party embed, and the data lives in the WordPress install instead of a SaaS account.
The honest framing is that Canny remains the stronger pick for multi-product SaaS teams that lean on its integrations and admin analytics. SleekView is the better fit for WordPress sites that want feedback to be part of the same database as the rest of the content, with no per-user pricing, and with the same data renderable as kanban and table views inside the site.
Workflow
How a Canny board becomes a SleekView feedback view
Pick the CPT
Add the fields
Configure the feedback view
Embed in WordPress
Comparison
SleekView vs Canny at a glance
Differences
What changes when you move off Canny
The Canny way
- Feedback lives in Canny's database, not WordPress
- Embedded via script or subdomain, not a shortcode
- Per-seat pricing scales with admins and members
- ACF and Meta Box are outside the model
- Cross-references in WordPress go through the Canny API
The SleekView way
- Feedback board over any CPT
- Ideas stored in your WordPress database
- No per-user fees, included with the plugin licence
- Same data also as kanban and table
- Shortcode and block embed, no third-party script
Features
Three things that actually change how you work
Feedback as part of WordPress
Canny lives next to WordPress as a SaaS connected by SSO and a script tag. SleekView lives inside WordPress, with ideas as CPT posts, votes as meta fields, and statuses as a taxonomy or ACF select that the rest of the site already understands.
No per-user pricing
Canny's plans scale with admins and members. SleekView is a single plugin licence (also part of the Sleek All Access Pass), so adding contributors or boards over the years does not raise the per-user cost.
One CPT, three views
Canny separates feedback, roadmap, and changelog into modules. SleekView ships the public feedback board, an internal kanban grouped by status, and a sortable table for reporting as three views over the same CPT, with no duplication.
Migration
Moving from Canny to SleekView
1. Export from Canny
Use Canny's CSV export or API to dump ideas, statuses, categories, and vote counts. Note any tags and per-post custom fields so they can map to ACF or Meta Box fields on the WordPress side.
2. Define a feedback CPT
Create a CPT in WordPress for ideas, with ACF or Meta Box fields for description, area, status, and a vote-count meta field. Match the attribute set Canny used so the import is a one-to-one mapping.
3. Import the data
Bring the export into the CPT through WP All Import or a similar tool. Carry Canny vote counts as meta values; SleekView takes over voting from there. Map authors to existing WordPress users where possible.
4. Embed and retire
Replace the Canny script or subdomain with a SleekView shortcode or block on the same page, add a kanban view for the team, and once verified, cancel the Canny subscription and remove the embed.
Audience
Where teams move from Canny to SleekView
Single-product WordPress sites
Sites running one main product on WordPress that do not need Canny's PM-tool sync or multi-product admin often save by switching to SleekView. The feedback workflow stays similar, the per-seat pricing goes away, and the data sits inside the existing site.
Data-sovereignty and procurement
Teams that need feedback data to stay in the company's own database (regulated industries, enterprise procurement, internal tools) keep ideas, votes, and statuses inside WordPress with SleekView rather than splitting them across a SaaS.
Cross-referenced reporting
When marketing, support, and product all need to query feedback alongside other WordPress data (release notes, articles, products), having ideas as a CPT means standard WP_Query works. No bridging the Canny API into each report.
The bigger picture
Why feedback that lives in WordPress beats feedback hosted elsewhere
Canny earned its place by giving product-led growth teams a polished feedback workflow long before WordPress had a structured answer for it. The SaaS is well-built, the integrations into PM tools are real, and for companies running across multiple products or stacks the multi-product admin is genuinely useful. For a WordPress-first business the calculation looks different.
The feedback data lives in a separate database from the rest of the content, the pricing scales with admin and member counts, and any cross-reference from the WordPress side (release-note posts, homepage widgets, internal reports slicing feedback by area) has to go through Canny's API or a script-driven embed. SleekView's contribution is to argue that on a WordPress site, feedback can be part of the same data the rest of the site already runs on. Ideas become a CPT, votes become meta fields, statuses become taxonomies or ACF selects, and the feedback board is one of three views over that CPT alongside kanban and table.
The pricing is the plugin licence, not a per-seat plan, and the integration story is the existing WP_Query, REST, and theme template world rather than a remote API. The honest reading is that Canny still wins for multi-product SaaS teams that need PM-tool sync and a hosted analytics layer; SleekView wins for the much larger group of WordPress sites that just want feedback to be a first-class part of their own install.
Questions
Common questions about switching from Canny
For the feedback-board and public-roadmap workflow, broadly yes. SleekView does not include Canny's SaaS extras (multi-product admin, in-app feedback widget across non-WP apps, native sync with Jira, Linear, and Asana). Teams that lean on those integrations may keep Canny or pair it with SleekView. WordPress-first teams that want a working feedback board usually find SleekView's core workflow sufficient.
In your WordPress database, as posts in the CPT you choose. Vote counts are meta fields, with a separate voter ledger that enforces one vote per user. No feedback data leaves the install, so existing backup, access, and compliance controls apply automatically.
Canny's pricing scales with seats and admin counts; SleekView is a flat plugin licence (or part of the Sleek All Access Pass) with no per-user fees. Teams typically save once they have multiple admins or boards, though very small setups on Canny's lower tiers may see comparable cost at small scale.
There is no native sync to Jira, Linear, or Asana inside SleekView. Most teams who need that wire it up through Zapier or n8n on top of the WordPress REST API, since each idea is a regular post with a known schema. The integration is more DIY than Canny's, but the data is more accessible because it is a CPT.
Through WordPress's standard login system. Any SSO plugin or custom OAuth setup already used for WordPress applies to who can vote, comment, or post ideas in SleekView. There is no separate SSO layer to configure.
Yes. Use a taxonomy or ACF select for area, then expose it as a filter on the feedback view. The same field drives grouping on a kanban view and a column on a table view, so one taxonomy serves all three renderings.
Yes, as initial meta values on the imported posts. SleekView treats the imported count as the starting number and adds or removes votes from there as users vote inside the new board. Canny's voter ledger does not migrate, but the visible totals do.
Yes. Canny stays embedded while SleekView is built over the new CPT. Once verified, swap the embed for the SleekView shortcode, redirect the Canny subdomain if used, and cancel the subscription.
Pricing
More than 1000+
happy customers
Explore our flexible licensing options tailored to your needs. Upgrade your license anytime to access more features, or opt for a lifetime license for ongoing value, including lifetime updates and lifetime support. Our hassle-free upgrade process ensures that our platform can grow with you, starting from whichever plan you choose.
Lifetime ♾️
Most popular
EUR
once
- Unlimited websites
- Lifetime updates
- Lifetime support
...or get the Bundle Deal
and save €250 🎁
The Bundle (unlimited sites)
Pay once, own it forever
Elevate your WordPress site with our exclusive plugin bundle that includes all of our premium plugins in one package. Enjoy lifetime updates and lifetime support. Save significantly compared to buying plugins individually.
What’s included
-
SleekAI
-
SleekByte
-
SleekMotion
-
SleekPixel
-
SleekRank
-
SleekView
€749
Continue to checkout