The GravityView alternative for non-Gravity-Forms data
GravityView turns Gravity Forms entries into frontend views. SleekView turns custom post types, ACF, Meta Box, and WooCommerce data into the same kind of frontend views — tables, kanban, and feedback boards — without depending on Gravity Forms.
♾️ Lifetime License available
Same idea, different data source
GravityView is the de-facto way to publish Gravity Forms entries on the frontend. If your structured data lives in Gravity Forms, it is hard to beat: directories, profile pages, edit-entry flows, and approvals are all built on the entry model. The catch is the dependency — GravityView assumes Gravity Forms is the source of truth, so anything stored as a custom post type, ACF field, Meta Box field, or WooCommerce record either has to be moved into Gravity Forms or addressed by another tool.
SleekView is that other tool. It builds the same kind of frontend views — tables, kanban boards, feedback boards — but pulls data from custom post types, ACF, Meta Box, and WooCommerce instead of Gravity Forms entries. For sites whose structured data already lives in CPTs (which is the WordPress-native pattern), SleekView is a more direct fit; for sites whose structured data already lives in Gravity Forms entries, GravityView remains the better tool.
Most of the teams that switch had Gravity Forms for collection but did not want it as a database. They keep GravityView for the form-entry views it was designed for and use SleekView for the rest.
Workflow
How a non-entry view in GravityView becomes a SleekView
Identify the underlying data
Configure the SleekView source
Set up filters and search
Embed and split responsibilities
Comparison
SleekView vs GravityView at a glance
Differences
What changes when you move off GravityView
The GravityView way
- Built specifically for Gravity Forms entries — requires Gravity Forms as a dependency
- Not designed to read custom post types, ACF, or Meta Box as primary sources
- Gravity Forms license required in addition to GravityView
- Editing flows assume the entry data model, not the post data model
- Limited fit for WooCommerce orders and products as native data sources
The SleekView way
- Frontend views from CPTs, ACF, Meta Box, and WooCommerce
- No Gravity Forms dependency
- Tables, kanban, and feedback boards on the same data
- Built-in search, filters, sort, and pagination
- Embeds via shortcode or block in any page or template
Features
Three things that actually change how you work
Reads the data WordPress already stores
SleekView pulls from custom post types, ACF, Meta Box, taxonomies, and WooCommerce — the WordPress-native data layer. There is no need to migrate data into Gravity Forms entries to publish it on the frontend.
Tables, kanban, and feedback boards
GravityView's view types orbit the entry list and entry detail. SleekView ships table, kanban, and feedback board layouts on top of the same data, suited to project tracking, idea collection, and structured directories that are not entry-shaped.
No Gravity Forms license required
GravityView assumes you are already paying for Gravity Forms — and most teams are, for the form builder itself. SleekView has no such dependency, so a site that does not use Gravity Forms can still get equivalent frontend views of its CPT and ACF data.
Migration
Choosing what to keep in GravityView vs. move to SleekView
1. Map each view to its data source
Walk through every GravityView on the site and note whether the data behind it is Gravity Forms entries or something else (CPTs, ACF, Meta Box, WooCommerce). The non-entry views are the migration candidates.
2. Recreate non-entry views in SleekView
For each view backed by CPTs or custom fields, build a SleekView with the same data source and the matching columns. Pick the layout that suits the use case — table, kanban, or feedback board.
3. Wire up frontend filters and search
Configure the visitor-side controls per view. SleekView's filter and search configuration sits next to the columns, rather than inside a separate form-entry workflow.
4. Keep GravityView for genuine entry workflows
If a view depends on entry editing, approvals, or Gravity Forms-specific logic, leave it on GravityView. The two plugins coexist cleanly because their primary data sources are different.
Audience
Who tends to switch from GravityView
Sites whose data is in CPTs, not entries
If the structured data is already a custom post type with ACF or Meta Box fields — staff, properties, projects, case studies — SleekView reads it directly without forcing a move into Gravity Forms entries.
Teams avoiding the double license
Running GravityView requires Gravity Forms too. Teams that do not otherwise use Gravity Forms often pick SleekView to avoid paying for a form builder they do not need.
Boards and tables, not entry detail pages
GravityView is strong on entry detail and edit flows. When the deliverable is a kanban of projects or a feedback board for ideas, SleekView's layouts are a more direct fit.
The bigger picture
Why the data source decides the right tool
GravityView and SleekView are easy to compare on the surface — both publish structured data on the frontend with searchable, filterable views — but they sit on top of different data models, and that decides which one fits a given site. GravityView treats Gravity Forms entries as the source of truth. The view types, the editing flows, the approval logic, and the styling primitives all assume that the underlying records are entries.
For sites that already collect everything through Gravity Forms, that assumption is a feature: one tool covers form, storage, view, and edit. For sites whose structured data lives natively in WordPress as custom post types with ACF or Meta Box fields, the same assumption becomes a tax. Records have to be migrated into entries, or shadow-copied across, or addressed through extension layers that translate one model into the other.
SleekView removes that friction by reading the WordPress-native model directly. Tables, kanban boards, and feedback boards over CPTs and custom fields are first-class. The clearest signal for which tool to pick is upstream: where is the data actually stored today? If it is in Gravity Forms entries, stay with GravityView.
If it is in posts and custom fields, SleekView is the more direct path.
Questions
Common questions about switching from GravityView
No — SleekView's data sources are custom post types, ACF, Meta Box, and WooCommerce, not Gravity Forms entries. If your view is fundamentally about Gravity Forms entries (an applicant directory, a submission archive, an entry approval flow), GravityView remains the right tool.
No. SleekView has no dependency on Gravity Forms. Sites using other form plugins, or no form plugin at all, can still build frontend views of their CPT and custom-field data with SleekView.
GravityView's edit-entry feature is one of its strongest cards and SleekView does not aim to match it. SleekView focuses on read-friendly views with kanban drag-to-update for status fields. If your workflow needs full frontend record editing, GravityView (or a form-driven approach) is more appropriate.
Yes. GravityView handles the entry-driven views, SleekView handles the post-driven views, and they do not compete for the same data sources. Many sites end up running both, each on the half of the data it is best at.
Approval workflows around form entries are GravityView territory. SleekView does not implement entry approvals. For lightweight status tracking, the kanban layout's drag-to-update on a status field can serve a similar role for post-based data, but it is not a full approval workflow.
Often yes. If Gravity Forms is being purchased solely so GravityView can run, removing both licenses in favour of SleekView for non-entry views is usually cheaper. Compare the totals against your real usage; if you already pay for Gravity Forms for actual form work, that calculus changes.
Frontend directory tables backed by CPTs are a primary SleekView use case. Per-record profile detail pages are typically handled by single-CPT templates in WordPress itself; SleekView focuses on the listing and filtering side of those directories rather than re-implementing single-post templates.
Each SleekView ships with search, filters, and sorting configured at the view level. The breadth is comparable to GravityView's per-view search for common cases — text search, taxonomy filters, status filters — without entry-specific concepts like form-field search.
Pricing
More than 1000+
happy customers
Explore our flexible licensing options tailored to your needs. Upgrade your license anytime to access more features, or opt for a lifetime license for ongoing value, including lifetime updates and lifetime support. Our hassle-free upgrade process ensures that our platform can grow with you, starting from whichever plan you choose.
Lifetime ♾️
Most popular
EUR
once
- Unlimited websites
- Lifetime updates
- Lifetime support
...or get the Bundle Deal
and save €250 🎁
The Bundle (unlimited sites)
Pay once, own it forever
Elevate your WordPress site with our exclusive plugin bundle that includes all of our premium plugins in one package. Enjoy lifetime updates and lifetime support. Save significantly compared to buying plugins individually.
What’s included
-
SleekAI
-
SleekByte
-
SleekMotion
-
SleekPixel
-
SleekRank
-
SleekView
€749
Continue to checkout