SleekView Feedback for WordLift
WordLift builds a knowledge graph, annotates entities, and pushes schema markup from WordPress. SleekView Feedback turns those entity rows into a sortable board so editors and SEOs can upvote entity additions, flag wrong mappings, and track which nodes actually get curated.
♾️ Lifetime License available
From WordLift entities to a live curation board
WordLift stores every entity, knowledge graph node, schema annotation, and content recommendation inside your WordPress install. Each row carries the entity URI, the entity type, the relationship data, the schema output, and the assigned vocabulary. The vocabulary screen is good for one editor tagging one post, but it cannot triage a multi thousand node knowledge graph across an editorial team.
SleekView Feedback reads any WordLift source you point it at, including entity posts in the entity custom post type, the postmeta rows that hold knowledge graph relationships, or a custom query against wp_posts filtered by entity type. It renders one card per entity, sorted by upvotes, with a status pill, a category tag, and a vote button that writes straight back to the column you chose.
You stop chasing schema corrections through email threads and editor notes. SEOs, editors, and clients land on a clean board, upvote the entity additions they want curated first, downflag wrong mappings, and your knowledge graph stops drifting from how your audience actually searches for and talks about the topics you publish on.
Workflow
From WordLift entities to a public board
Pick the WordLift source
entity custom post type, schema annotations in postmeta, or knowledge graph nodes in a saved query all work fine. Apply any WHERE clause to filter by entity type, language, or vocabulary so the board only shows curation work your editors actually care about right now.
Map vote, status, category
Embed the feedback view
Votes write back to WordLift
Sample board
Sample WordLift entity review board
Comparison
WordLift admin vs SleekView Feedback
WordLift vocabulary screen
- Entity list sits in a vocabulary screen only editors and SEOs ever open
- No way for readers or clients to upvote which entities need curation first
- Wrong mapping reports get lost in inline editor notes nobody reviews
- Status of each entity is buried in postmeta with no shared editorial view
- No public queue showing stakeholders which entities are queued, drafted, or live
SleekView Feedback
- One card per WordLift entity with title, votes, status pill, and entity type tag
-
Upvote writes back to a column in
postmetaso future curation sorts by score - Filter by entity type, language, or vocabulary using any column already in postmeta
- Embed on a public page or behind a login with one shortcode or block
- Editors stop arguing in inline notes and start voting on entities in WordPress
Features
What SleekView Feedback gives you for WordLift
Entity review built in
Each WordLift entity becomes a votable card with title, type, and schema status. SEOs see which entities need curation, which mappings feel wrong, and which nodes are ready. The board acts as a living changelog of your knowledge graph queue without any extra spreadsheet to keep updated at all.
Wrong mapping flags inline
Add a wrong mapping category and editors flag any entity that resolves to the wrong concept. The flag lives next to the source row, so the SEO can fix the URI before another sync instead of finding out from a Search Console error report or a competitor outranking the brand on a knowledge panel.
Upvotes feed back into curation
Because votes write to the source column, you can sort WordLift curation sessions by score, give high voted entities more research time, and quietly drop ones nobody cares about. The feedback loop stops being a feeling and becomes a real number you can defend in any SEO planning meeting.
Audience
How teams use the WordLift feedback board
Editorial entity triage
Internal editors upvote the WordLift entities worth curating this sprint and downflag mappings that broke after content updates. The board replaces a cluttered vocabulary screen and gives the SEO lead one place to triage the curation queue every Monday morning before standup begins.
Client facing entity vote
Agencies share the board with clients so they can vote on which WordLift entities to add for new product launches. The client sees exactly what is queued and feels in control of the knowledge graph without ever needing access to your WordPress admin or the WordLift settings.
Schema audit queue
SEO leads use the board as a schema audit queue. Anything flagged for wrong mapping, missing properties, or broken JSON LD gets reviewed first, and resolved items move to a Curated status so the audit trail is visible without trawling entity history one record at a time across the site.
The bigger picture
Why a WordLift feedback board changes knowledge graph work
WordLift is great at turning your content into structured entities and pushing rich schema to search engines. It is much worse at telling you which of the thousands of entities in the graph actually need editorial attention this month. Most teams end up with a sprawling vocabulary screen and no shared way to decide which entities to curate next, so SEOs default to fixing whatever they happen to spot and older nodes quietly drift out of sync with the brand reality.
A feedback board changes that pattern. Entities stop being abstract artifacts and start being something the team and the audience react to in the open. Upvotes give you a cheap, honest signal about which nodes deserve real curation time.
Mapping flags give you a backlog sorted by impact instead of by whoever shouted loudest in the last meeting. And because everything writes back to the source row, the next time WordLift suggests entities it already knows which ones earned attention. The result is fewer wrong mappings, fewer broken schema previews, and a much cleaner knowledge graph that actually matches how your audience searches for the brand.
Questions
Common questions about SleekView Feedback for WordLift
No. SleekView Feedback reads directly from whatever table or post type WordLift is using. You point it at the source, pick the columns for votes, status, category, author, and title, and the board renders. There is no ETL job, no sync, and no duplicated data. Anything WordLift writes shows up on the next page load.
 Yes. SleekView ships with anonymous voting backed by cookies, so public visitors can upvote entity requests without an account. You can also require login if you want the board restricted to editors or paying clients, and the same view handles both modes with a single setting toggle in the WordPress admin.
 Each visitor gets a cookie scoped vote token per item, and logged in users are tracked by user ID. The plugin also exposes a per IP rate limit so a single visitor cannot spam the board, which is enough to keep public boards honest without forcing a full signup wall in front of casual readers and other curious stakeholders.
 Yes. SleekView accepts a WHERE clause when you wire up the data source, so you can scope the board to one entity type, one language, or any combination of meta fields WordLift already stores. Different boards on different pages can use different filters with no extra plugin setup at all for each curation area.
 Mapping feedback is just a category value on the row. You can write it into a meta key WordLift already understands or a dedicated column. Either way it shows up in the WordPress admin next to the original entity, so the SEO who owns the URI can see the flag without leaving WordPress or jumping into the vocabulary settings.
 They write back to the source column, which means WordLift and any of your own queries can sort future curation sessions, retries, and audits by that score. Several teams use the score to gate which entities get researched at all, which makes the board operational and not just a vanity dashboard for stakeholders.
 Both. SleekView ships as a Gutenberg block, an Elementor widget, a Bricks element, and a classic shortcode. Theme developers can also call the render function from PHP and pass a configuration array, so you can mount the board on any template without touching the page editor or the block library at all.
 The view paginates on the server and only loads the rows it needs to render the current page. Indexed columns stay fast even on long tables. For really big graphs, scoping the board by entity type or language keeps both the query and the audience focused, so the page stays snappy even at scale with tens of thousands of stored entity records.
 Pricing
More than 1000+
happy customers
Explore our flexible licensing options tailored to your needs. Upgrade your license anytime to access more features, or opt for a lifetime license for ongoing value, including lifetime updates and lifetime support. Our hassle-free upgrade process ensures that our platform can grow with you, starting from whichever plan you choose.
Lifetime ♾️
Most popular
EUR
once
- Unlimited websites
- Lifetime updates
- Lifetime support
...or get the Bundle Deal
and save €250 🎁
The Bundle (unlimited sites)
Pay once, own it forever
Elevate your WordPress site with our exclusive plugin bundle that includes all of our premium plugins in one package. Enjoy lifetime updates and lifetime support. Save significantly compared to buying plugins individually.
What’s included
-
SleekAI
-
SleekByte
-
SleekMotion
-
SleekPixel
-
SleekRank
-
SleekView
€749
Continue to checkout