No. The plugin still matches incoming requests and issues the HTTP response. SleekView reads the underlying records and renders them as a grid. Disabling SleekView leaves every redirect rule firing exactly as before.

From the store WP Redirect Manager already maintains: the source, destination, status code, enabled flag, hit count (where the version tracks it), and last-access timestamp, along with a created timestamp on the record. No additional logger or premium add-on is required.

Yes, where WP Redirect Manager tracks hit counts. Sort the grid by hits descending and the top rules are the ones carrying real traffic. If hit-tracking is disabled in the plugin's settings, the column honestly shows empty rather than fabricating numbers.

Yes. last_access is a column on the rule record where the version tracks it, so a filter on last_access older than 90 days surfaces dead-weight rules safe to drop in a cleanup. The audit becomes a defensible record.

Yes. SleekView reads whichever store the installed version of WP Redirect Manager uses (custom post type or custom table). The grid adapts to the columns and meta keys actually present, so older and newer versions both render real data.

Yes. The plugin writes per-site records on multisite, and SleekView respects that scope. Each subsite has its own redirect grid, and a network roll-up can aggregate rule counts across blogs.

No. Only the rows on the current page are queried, and the rule store is well indexed by the plugin. A site with thirteen hundred rules queries the same as a site with thirteen because pagination keeps the row count constant.

Yes. Any filtered view exports to CSV with source, destination, status code, enabled flag, hits, and last_access. That sheet is the exact migration artifact the next redirect system needs to ingest.