✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount

The FacetWP alternative for full-stack frontend data views

FacetWP gives you faceted filtering you wire into your own template. SleekView gives you a complete frontend data view — table, kanban, or feedback board — with filters, search, sort, and pagination included as part of the same configuration.

♾️ Lifetime License available

SleekView — FacetWP alternative

Facets you wire up vs. views you embed

FacetWP is a powerful, well-regarded faceted-search plugin. It builds an index over your WordPress posts and exposes facets — checkboxes, dropdowns, sliders, autocompletes — that filter a templated listing on the frontend. The core mental model is: you supply the listing template, FacetWP supplies the facets that filter it. That separation is intentional, and it is exactly why developer-led teams choose it.

SleekView lives one layer up. Instead of a facet engine you compose into a custom template, SleekView is a complete view — a table, kanban, or feedback board — with the listing, columns, filters, search, sorting, and pagination configured together. The data sources are the same kind of WordPress objects (custom post types, ACF, Meta Box, WooCommerce), but the unit of work is a finished view, not facets-plus-template.

FacetWP wins clearly when the listing is highly bespoke — a directory with hand-crafted cards, a map view with custom markers, a search experience that spans multiple post types and templates. SleekView wins when the listing is a structured table or board and you would rather not assemble it manually.

Workflow

How a FacetWP listing becomes a SleekView

1

Audit the existing setup

List every FacetWP listing on the site along with its template, the facets attached to it, and the data fields used. Flag the ones that are essentially structured tables — those are the strong migration candidates.
2

Build the SleekView

Pick the post type, add the columns matching the listing's data, and configure the filters and search at the view level. Choose a table, kanban, or feedback board layout depending on the use case.
3

Replace the embed

Swap the FacetWP listing shortcode and any facet shortcodes for the SleekView shortcode or block. The view is self-contained, so the surrounding template can be simpler.
4

Decide the boundary

Keep FacetWP for any bespoke directory layouts where its index and listing builder genuinely earn their keep. Use SleekView for structured tables, kanban, and feedback boards elsewhere on the site.

Comparison

SleekView vs FacetWP at a glance

Feature
FacetWP
SleekView
Scope
Faceted filtering layer
Complete view (layout + filters + search)
Listing template
You write or template it
Built into the view configuration
Kanban / feedback boards
No
Yes, alongside tables
Indexing model
Custom index for fast facets
Standard WP queries with caching
Best fit
Bespoke directories with custom layouts
Structured tables and boards out of the box
Embed model
Shortcode + theme template
Shortcode or block, self-contained

Differences

What changes when you move off FacetWP

The short version: snippets stop being data trapped behind an admin screen and start being code you can actually work with. That sounds small — in practice it changes how your whole team ships WordPress fixes and features.

The FacetWP way

  • Filtering layer only — you supply the listing template
  • No native kanban or feedback board layouts
  • Layout output relies on theme templates or shortcode integrations
  • Each facet type is configured per facet rather than as part of a unified view
  • Frontend styling is largely theme- and CSS-dependent

The SleekView way

  • Complete views — listing + filters + search + pagination
  • Tables, kanban, and feedback boards as first-class layouts
  • First-class ACF, Meta Box, CPT, and WooCommerce support
  • Embeds as a shortcode or block with consistent styling
  • Configuration is view-level, not facet-by-facet

Features

Three things that actually change how you work

Anyone can list features on a comparison table. These are the three shifts that matter day to day when you replace FacetWP with SleekView.

Views, not just facets

Each SleekView is a complete unit: the listing layout (table, kanban, feedback board), the columns, the search, the filters, the sort, and the pagination. There is no separate template to write — drop the view into a page and it renders with consistent styling.

Layouts FacetWP does not target

FacetWP focuses on filtering existing listings. SleekView ships kanban (group posts by status, drag between columns) and feedback boards (visitor comments and votes) as built-in layouts, in addition to tables — categories of view that fall outside FacetWP's scope.

Filters configured at the view level

Filters in SleekView are part of the same configuration as the columns and the layout, so they stay in sync. You do not maintain facets in one screen, listing templates in another, and pagination in a third.

Migration

Moving FacetWP-driven listings to SleekView

SleekView and FacetWP can run side by side. That means you can migrate at your own pace — there's no big switch weekend required.

1. Decide which listings should become structured views

FacetWP shines for bespoke directories where the listing is custom. Listings that are essentially structured tables or boards are the strong migration candidates.

2. Rebuild each as a SleekView

Pick the post type, add columns matching the listing's data, and configure search, filters, sort, and pagination at the view level. ACF and Meta Box fields map directly.

3. Replace the FacetWP shortcodes and templates

Swap the FacetWP listing and facet shortcodes for the SleekView shortcode or block on the relevant pages. Confirm the visitor-side behaviour matches expectations.

4. Keep FacetWP for the layouts it suits best

If a directory or search experience genuinely needs custom card layouts and a tightly tuned facet index, leave it on FacetWP. SleekView is not aimed at fully bespoke listings.

Audience

Who tends to switch from FacetWP

Listings that are really tables

If the FacetWP listing is rows of structured data — date, title, status, owner — a SleekView table replaces the facet-plus-template setup with a single configuration screen.

Teams adding kanban or feedback boards

FacetWP cannot natively render kanban or feedback boards. Teams that need those layouts often reach for SleekView for the new views and keep FacetWP for any legacy directories.

Builders who want less template work

If you would rather not write loop templates and per-card markup just to get a filterable list of CPTs, SleekView's view-level configuration removes that step.

The bigger picture

Why a complete view tool fits some jobs better than a facet engine

FacetWP and SleekView are easy to confuse because both end up filtering posts on the frontend, but they sit at different layers. FacetWP is a filtering engine designed to plug into listings you control. The strength of that design is flexibility — any listing, any layout, any post type combination can be filtered.

The cost is that the listing itself is your responsibility, and so is the styling, the per-card template, and the integration with theme markup. For an agency building a one-off real-estate directory or a bespoke job board, that flexibility is exactly the right trade. SleekView trades flexibility for completeness.

A view is a single configuration: the layout (table, kanban, feedback board), the columns, the filters, the search, the sort, the pagination. The result drops into any page and looks consistent without writing a template. That trade is the wrong one for a fully bespoke directory and the right one for the dozens of structured tables and boards a typical site actually needs.

The healthy outcome is usually both tools coexisting: FacetWP for the bespoke pieces, SleekView for the structured ones.

Questions

Common questions about switching from FacetWP

Not in the same sense as FacetWP. SleekView includes filtering, search, and sorting as part of each view, but it is not a general faceted-search index for arbitrary listings across the site. If your goal is to add facets to a custom directory you have already built, FacetWP is purpose-built for that and remains the stronger choice.

 

No. SleekView relies on standard WordPress queries with caching where appropriate. FacetWP's index is part of why it scales filtering on very large datasets; SleekView's performance characteristics match standard paginated archives on the same hosting.

 

Yes. They target different parts of the page lifecycle, do not share hooks at the storage layer, and can run side by side. The common pattern is FacetWP for large bespoke directories and SleekView for structured tables and boards elsewhere on the site.

 

FacetWP's Listing Builder lets you compose flexible listing layouts that pair with facets. SleekView is not aimed at fully bespoke listings — it is aimed at structured views where rows or cards follow the same shape. If your listing is highly visual and irregular, FacetWP's listing layer is better suited.

 

FacetWP has more filter types out of the box (range sliders, proximity, hierarchical select, autocomplete) and a longer track record on filter UX. SleekView covers the common patterns (search, taxonomy filter, value filter, sort, pagination) at the view level. For the breadth of a faceted-search system, FacetWP is still the leader.

 

When the deliverable is a structured table, kanban, or feedback board sourced from CPTs, ACF, Meta Box, or WooCommerce data, and you want one configuration screen instead of an index, a facet config, and a template. The view shows up consistently styled and ready to embed.

 

Yes — WooCommerce products and orders are supported data sources, and you can build frontend tables with filters and search. For full-bore shop filtering with many facet types and large catalogues, FacetWP is still strong. For straightforward product or order tables on member, vendor, or B2B pages, SleekView fits naturally.

 

Each view targets one post type at a time. FacetWP's facets can span multiple post types in a unified search experience; if that cross-post-type search is the core requirement, FacetWP is purpose-built for it.

 

Pricing

More than 1000+
happy customers

Explore our flexible licensing options tailored to your needs. Upgrade your license anytime to access more features, or opt for a lifetime license for ongoing value, including lifetime updates and lifetime support. Our hassle-free upgrade process ensures that our platform can grow with you, starting from whichever plan you choose.

Starter

€79

EUR

per year

  • 3 websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Pro

€149

EUR

per year

  • Unlimited websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Lifetime ♾️

Most popular

€249

EUR

once

  • Unlimited websites
  • Lifetime updates
  • Lifetime support

...or get the Bundle Deal
and save €250 🎁

The Bundle (unlimited sites)

Pay once, own it forever

Elevate your WordPress site with our exclusive plugin bundle that includes all of our premium plugins in one package. Enjoy lifetime updates and lifetime support. Save significantly compared to buying plugins individually.

What’s included

  • SleekAI

  • SleekByte

  • SleekMotion

  • SleekPixel

  • SleekRank

  • SleekView