✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount

SleekView Feedback for CampaignHQ

CampaignHQ syncs lists, transactional events, and campaign metadata into WordPress. SleekView Feedback turns those rows into a sortable board so editors and subscribers vote on the sends worth repeating, flag the ones that missed, and steer the next campaign with real signal.

♾️ Lifetime License available

SleekView Feedback board for CampaignHQ

Turn CampaignHQ sends into a shared review queue

CampaignHQ stores campaign metadata, list IDs, and transactional logs inside WordPress, usually as a custom post type plus a settings page that hooks into the CampaignHQ API. That covers the send flow, but it leaves editors with no shared view of which sends actually worked, which template earned the highest engagement, and which list deserves a follow up next quarter. Numbers live in CampaignHQ, opinions live in Slack, and the WordPress side stays silent.

SleekView Feedback reads whichever post type or log table holds your CampaignHQ records, treats each send as a card, and exposes the columns you care about. Pick a numeric field for upvotes, a status field for sent, scheduled, or paused, a category field for the list or segment, and you have a queue the whole team can use. Filters let the same data power a reader vote, an editorial review, and a client report.

The shift is that campaign quality stops being a private metric inside wp_options. Anyone with the link lands on the board, sorts by votes, filters by list, and contributes. Subscribers stop replying with vague feedback and start voting on the sends they actually want repeated.

Workflow

Wire CampaignHQ into a feedback board

1

Connect the CampaignHQ source

Point SleekView at the post type or log table CampaignHQ writes to inside WordPress. Filter by list, segment, or campaign type so the board only shows sends your editors actually want to review. A date filter keeps the board fresh and excludes test sends from
2

Map vote, status, list

Choose which numeric column counts as upvotes, which column holds the status label like sent or scheduled, and which column carries the list or segment name. SleekView reads these on every page load so the board reflects whatever CampaignHQ and your editors
3

Embed the feedback view

Drop the SleekView block on any page or use the shortcode. Visitors see a sorted feed of campaigns with subject line, vote count, sender, status pill, and list pill. Filter by list, status, or campaign type and let editors and subscribers vote on the sends
4

Votes write back to CampaignHQ

Every upvote increments the vote column on the source row. That means future CampaignHQ sends can sort templates by score, retire low scoring formats, and prioritise the ones earning real subscriber love.

Sample board

Sample CampaignHQ feedback board

A peek at how recent CampaignHQ sends look on a SleekView Feedback board, with template praise, segment requests, transactional bug reports, and a couple of ideas about new automations mixed together.
298 votes
Black Friday template hit highest CTR of the year
Sofia D. Praise Shipped
176 votes
Add a re-engagement automation for 60 day inactive list
@retainmarc Feature request Planned
139 votes
Transactional receipt template missing order ID variable
Daniel R. Bug Investigating
84 votes
Personalise hero image per subscriber tag
Priya N. Idea In progress
46 votes
API webhook for unsubscribes sometimes fires twice
@devhanna Bug New
17 votes
Quarterly product update digest for B2B contacts
Marco T. Idea New

Comparison

CampaignHQ admin vs SleekView Feedback

CampaignHQ default screens

  • Campaign reports sit inside CampaignHQ only the marketer ever logs into
  • No way for editors or subscribers to upvote the templates that performed best
  • Deliverability complaints land as support email, not next to the campaign row
  • Status of each send is split across CampaignHQ and WordPress with no shared view
  • No public queue to show stakeholders which sends are queued, paused, or shipped

SleekView Feedback

  • One card per CampaignHQ send with subject, votes, status pill, and list tag
  • Upvote writes back to the source column so future campaigns can sort by score
  • Filter by list, segment, or campaign type using any column already in WordPress
  • Embed on a public page or behind a login with one shortcode or block
  • Editors stop forwarding screenshots and start voting on sends in wp-admin

Features

What SleekView Feedback gives you for CampaignHQ

Send review built in

Each CampaignHQ send becomes a votable card. The team sees which subject lines worked, which lists engaged, and which template deserves to be cloned next month. The board acts as a living changelog of the email program without anyone exporting a CSV from the

Deliverability flags inline

Add a Deliverability category and subscribers or editors can flag any CampaignHQ send with one click. The flag lives next to the campaign row, so the marketer can investigate spam folder hits or template render bugs before the next send instead of finding out

Upvotes feed the next send

Because votes write to the source column, you can sort CampaignHQ templates by score, give high voted formats more sends, and retire the ones nobody enjoys. The feedback loop stops being a hunch about open rates and becomes a number editors can sort and

Audience

How teams use the CampaignHQ board

Editorial newsletter review

Internal editors upvote the CampaignHQ sends worth repeating and flag the ones that misfired. The board replaces a stats spreadsheet and gives the editor in chief one screen to triage the newsletter queue every Monday.

Subscriber facing vote

Newsletter teams share the board with subscribers so they can vote on which CampaignHQ sends they want more of. The audience signals back which topics actually matter without ever opening CampaignHQ or replying to a

Deliverability triage queue

Email ops uses the board as a deliverability queue. Anything flagged with a high vote count gets reviewed first, and resolved items move to a Fixed status so the audit trail is visible without trawling through

The bigger picture

Why a CampaignHQ feedback board changes the workflow

CampaignHQ is good at sending campaigns and processing transactional email. It is much worse at telling you which of those sends your audience actually wanted to receive. Most teams end up with a stats dashboard nobody opens twice, a Slack channel full of opinions about subject lines, and a marketer with no shared view of which templates deserve to be cloned next.

A feedback board changes that pattern. Sends stop being silent broadcasts and start being something the team and audience react to in public. Upvotes give you a cheap, honest signal about which formats deserve more sends.

Deliverability flags give you a backlog sorted by impact instead of by whoever filed the loudest support ticket. And because everything writes back to the source row, the next CampaignHQ send is informed by data the team trusts because they helped produce it. The result is fewer dud sends, more campaigns that get forwarded, and a much shorter loop between today's send and tomorrow's plan.

Questions

Common questions about SleekView Feedback for CampaignHQ

No. SleekView Feedback reads directly from whatever post type or log table CampaignHQ writes to. You point it at the source, pick the columns for votes, status, category, author, and title, and the board renders. No ETL, no sync, no duplicated data.

 

Yes. SleekView ships with anonymous voting backed by cookies, so public subscribers can upvote sends without an account. You can also require login if you want the board restricted to editors or paying members, and the same view handles both modes with a single toggle.

 

Each visitor gets a cookie scoped vote token per item. Logged in users are tracked by user ID. The plugin also exposes a rate limit so a single IP cannot spam the board, which is enough to keep public boards honest without forcing a signup wall in front of subscribers.

 

Yes. SleekView accepts a WHERE clause when you wire up the data source, so you can scope the board to a particular list ID, segment, or campaign type CampaignHQ already tracks. Different boards on different pages can use different filters.

 

Deliverability is just a category value on the row. You can write it into a meta key CampaignHQ already understands or a dedicated column. Either way it shows up in the WordPress admin alongside the original campaign, so the email ops lead can see the flag without leaving WordPress.

 

They write back to the source column, which means CampaignHQ and any of your own queries can sort future templates and lists by that score. Several teams use the score to gate which formats get reused and which ones get retired, making the board operational and not a vanity dashboard.

 

Both. SleekView ships as a Gutenberg block, an Elementor widget, a Bricks element, and a classic shortcode. Theme developers can also call the render function from PHP and pass a configuration array, so you can mount the board on any template without touching the page editor.

 

The view paginates server side and only loads the rows it needs to render the current page. Indexed columns stay fast even on long tables. For busy senders, scoping the board by year, list, or campaign type keeps both the query and the audience focused, so the page feels snappy even at scale.

 

Pricing

More than 1000+
happy customers

Explore our flexible licensing options tailored to your needs. Upgrade your license anytime to access more features, or opt for a lifetime license for ongoing value, including lifetime updates and lifetime support. Our hassle-free upgrade process ensures that our platform can grow with you, starting from whichever plan you choose.

Starter

€79

EUR

per year

  • 3 websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Pro

€149

EUR

per year

  • Unlimited websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Lifetime ♾️

Most popular

€249

EUR

once

  • Unlimited websites
  • Lifetime updates
  • Lifetime support

...or get the Bundle Deal
and save €250 🎁

The Bundle (unlimited sites)

Pay once, own it forever

Elevate your WordPress site with our exclusive plugin bundle that includes all of our premium plugins in one package. Enjoy lifetime updates and lifetime support. Save significantly compared to buying plugins individually.

What’s included

  • SleekAI

  • SleekByte

  • SleekMotion

  • SleekPixel

  • SleekRank

  • SleekView