✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount

SleekView Feedback for SearchWP

SearchWP indexes posts into its own tables and writes per-engine relevance scores, click logs, and search logs into searchwp_log tables. SleekView renders one feedback card per indexed post, lets editors and SEOs upvote, and tags entries with status badges so search relevance stays inside WordPress.

♾️ Lifetime License available

SleekView Feedback board for SearchWP

Search relevance reviews built on the SearchWP tables

SearchWP builds its own index in custom tables and logs every search query and click into swp_log and swp_log_meta records, with per-post relevance attribution available through engine settings. The default admin gives you the Statistics screen with top queries, top results, and a no-results report, but no public-facing way to see which results the team most wants to improve or which the SEO team has already triaged.

SleekView reads those logs and the indexed posts directly and renders one feedback card per result. Pick the SearchWP click count for a post as the vote weight, attach a swp_review_status meta for the status badge, and pull the post category as the chip. Editors and SEOs can upvote a result card to flag content that is ranking for the wrong query or to highlight a high-converting result, and the increment writes back to the meta key you choose so reporting stays consistent.

Because SleekView is read-only against the SearchWP records, the indexer, the engines, and the existing Statistics screen keep working exactly as before. SleekView only adds a parallel review surface that ranks results by votes, shows category chips, and exposes status pills so anyone on the team can spot Wrong query, Needs boost, and Reviewed results at a glance.

Workflow

From the SearchWP logs to a feedback wall

1

Point SleekView at the SearchWP logs

Create a new view and select the swp_log click and result records as the source, joining the matching wp_posts row. SleekView ingests the records, respects engine scopes, and refreshes whenever SearchWP writes a new query or click into the log tables behind the scenes.
2

Pick vote, status, and category

Choose the click count for vote weight, a swp_review_status meta key for the status pill, and the primary post category for the chip. SleekView color-codes each value so Wrong query, Needs boost, and Reviewed results stand out instantly inside the feedback grid layout.
3

Embed the board on a public page

Drop the SleekView block on a Search Relevance Review or Editor Triage page. Visitors see a ranked grid of result cards with click counts, category chips, and status badges, and SEOs get a side panel listing the most upvoted results at the top of the queue.
4

Upvotes write back to meta

Every Upvote click writes an increment to the meta key you mapped, so the score lives next to the post and is visible alongside SearchWP custom report columns. You can also pipe the column into a saved SEO dashboard without leaving WordPress at all.

Sample board

Sample SearchWP review board

A small slice of how a Search Relevance feedback page looks once SleekView indexes the SearchWP click logs with click count as the vote score and a swp_review_status meta key driving the status pill on each card.
274 votes
Top result for pricing query points at the old plans page
Priya N. Wrong query In progress
221 votes
No-results report keeps spiking for an obvious common query
@maxseo Bug Open
169 votes
Add a per-engine boost slider on the result feedback cards
Aisha B. Feature request Planned
122 votes
Old changelog post outranks the new release notes page
Marco T. Needs boost Shipped
81 votes
PDF attachment indexing dropped after the last server move
Lena K. Bug Shipped
27 votes
Spam search query flooded the no-results log overnight
@hrjordan Spam Declined

Comparison

Default SearchWP versus SleekView Feedback

Default SearchWP admin

  • Admin-only Statistics screen with no public upvote, status pill, or category chip surface anywhere
  • No way for editors or SEOs to surface broken results without filing a separate support ticket first
  • Top results, no-results, and broken results all sit in the same stats screen with no review pill
  • Filtering by review state requires custom SearchWP reports and still keeps data inside admin
  • Result review counts and relevance signals live in spreadsheets instead of the SearchWP log tables

SleekView Feedback

  • Reads swp_log click and query records plus joined post meta with zero schema changes
  • Upvote button writes back to your chosen meta key so the score lives with the post
  • Status pills map cleanly to Wrong query, Needs boost, Reviewed, and Archived out of the box
  • Category chips pull the post taxonomy so each card shows the topic at a glance
  • Saved views let SEOs share filtered boards like Top clicked or Needs boost without code

Features

What SleekView Feedback gives you for SearchWP

Native SearchWP log support

SleekView speaks the SearchWP schema. It maps swp_log records, click counts, and joined post meta to vote, status, and category fields automatically, so a search relevance feedback board can go live in minutes without writing custom SearchWP hooks at all.

Real upvotes on real results

Each Upvote click increments a meta value on the underlying post. The score is queryable, exportable, and visible alongside the SearchWP Statistics columns, which keeps the Statistics screen as the source of truth instead of forking the data into a separate tool to manage.

Saved relevance triage views

SEOs get scoped saved views like Top clicked this week, Needs boost, or Wrong query. Each view is a stored filter on the swp_log records, so the team can hand off triage without rebuilding the filters every morning before the editorial standup begins.

Audience

Three teams that turn SearchWP into a feedback board

SEO and search teams

SEOs see a ranked board of results sorted by SearchWP click count and tagged with review status. Wrong-query results float to the top of a Needs boost board so they get adjusted before customers keep clicking the old plans page from the search bar.

Editorial teams

Editors upvote results they want re-ranked, see the current click count on each card, and stop filing duplicate Slack requests. The signal lives next to the post for the SEO team to act on at the next planning session without an email thread.

Agency search partners

Agencies running SearchWP across many client sites scope each board per client. Status pills surface results that need re-ranking, and saved view links can be shared with stakeholders without giving them SearchWP admin access on the client site at all.

The bigger picture

Why a search plugin needs a feedback loop

SearchWP nails site search in WordPress, and the Statistics screen captures everything a relevance engineer would want. But the Statistics screen is admin-only, the click logs live in a database table, and the moment a user fires a query the signal goes back to sleep. There is no view that ranks the whole site by click weight, no public surface where an editor can flag the top result that is pointing at the old plans page, no way for an SEO to share a Needs boost queue without exporting a spreadsheet.

The signal exists, it just lives in the wrong room. SleekView gives the SearchWP logs a public, vote-driven home. SEOs get a saved Triage board sorted by click count and review status pill.

Editors get a feedback wall where they can flag a misbehaving search result without filing a ticket. Agency teams get per-client scoping so each engagement has its own ranked queue. Nothing about SearchWP changes underneath, the engine and the Statistics screen stay the source of truth, and the review loop now lives where the team already works.

Questions

Common questions about SleekView Feedback for SearchWP

No. SleekView reads the existing swp_log and swp_log_meta records that SearchWP already writes during searches and clicks. The only write is the upvote increment, which lands on a meta key you choose so it sits next to the rest of the post data without touching the SearchWP tables or settings.

 

Yes. The Upvote button supports guest votes with a per-IP and per-session lock to keep counts honest. If you would rather restrict votes to logged-in users or to specific roles like Editor or SEO, you can flip that in the view settings without touching any code at all.

 

You map a swp_review_status meta key when you build the view. SleekView shows a colored pill for each value, and any result without a status simply renders without a pill rather than blocking the card from showing. SEOs can update the status by editing the post or via a custom admin column.

 

Yes. SleekView reads whichever engine logs you point the view at, so a site with separate engines for docs and product can publish two boards or one combined board with engine chips. The mapping happens at view setup time without any new configuration on the SearchWP side.

 

Yes. Every saved view has its own role and capability scope, so you can publish a public editorial feedback wall on the editor hub and a separate SEO Triage queue that only Editors and Authors can see. Both views share the same swp_log records underneath the surface.

 

When the underlying post is deleted, SleekView removes the card on the next refresh. If the post is trashed rather than fully deleted, the card disappears from the public view but the upvote meta is preserved on the trashed post in case you restore it later from the trash.

 

Yes. Every SleekView is available as a shortcode and a Gutenberg block, so you can drop a Top clicked this week view onto the editor hub, embed a Needs boost view on an internal Wiki page, or stitch several views into a single SEO dashboard with separate columns side by side.

 

SleekView paginates and sorts at the database level rather than loading every swp_log row into memory, so a site with millions of search and click logs still renders the top of the feedback board in well under a second on a normal shared host. Aggregation queries hit indexed columns.

 

Pricing

More than 1000+
happy customers

Explore our flexible licensing options tailored to your needs. Upgrade your license anytime to access more features, or opt for a lifetime license for ongoing value, including lifetime updates and lifetime support. Our hassle-free upgrade process ensures that our platform can grow with you, starting from whichever plan you choose.

Starter

€79

EUR

per year

  • 3 websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Pro

€149

EUR

per year

  • Unlimited websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Lifetime ♾️

Most popular

€249

EUR

once

  • Unlimited websites
  • Lifetime updates
  • Lifetime support

...or get the Bundle Deal
and save €250 🎁

The Bundle (unlimited sites)

Pay once, own it forever

Elevate your WordPress site with our exclusive plugin bundle that includes all of our premium plugins in one package. Enjoy lifetime updates and lifetime support. Save significantly compared to buying plugins individually.

What’s included

  • SleekAI

  • SleekByte

  • SleekMotion

  • SleekPixel

  • SleekRank

  • SleekView