Spiffy Calendar stores events in its own wp_sc_events table with category assignments in wp_sc_categories and an event page that lives as a virtual post served by the plugin. Comments attendees leave on each event entry land in the standard wp_comments table joined to the rendered event view. The default Spiffy front end is a colored calendar grid which works for browsing but offers no public, sortable surface for the post event feedback your audience already writes underneath each entry.

SleekView Feedback reads the same comments and event rows, groups them by Spiffy category, organiser, or venue, and renders one card per item sorted by votes. Each card shows the comment title, the running vote count, the attendee first name, a category pill like Category or Session, and a status pill that tracks whether your organiser team has acted on the note yet. Filter chips let visitors narrow to a single category, event, or status so the loudest signal stays one scroll from the page hero.

When a future attendee clicks Upvote on a comment that matches what they want next time, the count writes back into Spiffy comment meta, so the sorting reflects real demand instead of recency. Organisers see at a glance which Spiffy categories get the most love, which session complaints keep coming back, and which new format attendees keep asking for, all from one board reading straight from Spiffy Calendar.

Most organisers running Spiffy Calendar already collect great post event feedback, it just never makes it past the inbox or the comment thread on a single event entry. A future member deciding whether to attend next week has no way to see which complaint your team actually fixed last month, or which new programme finally shipped after a hundred upvotes. That gap costs trust on every comparison search, because the social proof exists but stays invisible.

SleekView Feedback gives the same data a public surface that feels like a modern roadmap tool. Comments show up as cards with vote counts, statuses, and category pills, so a single board answers questions like which programme delivers the best welcome, which venue complaint keeps coming back, and which new format attendees are begging for. The data never moves, the source of truth stays inside Spiffy Calendar, and yet the page reads like a Canny board purpose built for community programming.

Over a few months, that board becomes a living portfolio of how your programme listens to its audience, and that portfolio converts skeptical visitors into committed attendees far better than a color coded grid ever could.