SleekView Feedback for Borlabs Cookie
Borlabs Cookie manages consent banners, blocked services, and content blocker rules for GDPR and ePrivacy compliance. SleekView Feedback turns those services and rules into a sortable board so legal, marketing, and engineering can upvote what works, flag risky scripts, and decide every consent change in public.
♾️ Lifetime License available
From a private consent config to a public review feed
Borlabs Cookie keeps each consent service in a custom post type and stores group memberships, content blocker rules, and per service code snippets in wp_postmeta and a custom table. The admin UI is detailed, but it is also a single screen that only one person on the team ever fully understands. Legal asks why a tracker is in the necessary group, marketing asks why their new pixel still sits behind consent, engineering quietly adds a new service to ship a feature, and none of those decisions get reviewed together.
SleekView Feedback reads the Borlabs services and rules directly. Each service becomes one card with the service name, the cookie keys it sets, the group it lives in, and the content blocker rule it activates. You map an upvote column for confidence, a status column for labels like Active, Under review, Trial, or Retired, and a category column for tags like necessary, statistics, marketing, or external_content. From that point the team votes on each service in public.
The consent config stops being one engineer's private decision and becomes a board with a vote history, a clear audit trail, and a place for legal to live.
Workflow
From Borlabs services to a public review
Point at Borlabs services
wp_postmeta for the group and rule data. Add a WHERE clause to scope by group, status, or recent change so the board only shows the services your team actually wants to review during this consent cycle, not the full list.
Map vote, status, category
Embed the consent board
Votes feed cleanup and audits
Sample board
Sample Borlabs consent review board
Comparison
Borlabs admin vs SleekView Feedback
Borlabs default services screen
- Services live in one settings UI that only the configuring engineer fully reads
- No way for legal or marketing to upvote the services they trust to keep enabled
- Retire requests for stale trackers get lost in chat instead of tracked on the service
- No audit log of who added each service, when, and on what compliance basis
- Quarterly consent review starts from scratch instead of a ranked board of services
SleekView Feedback
- One card per Borlabs service with cookie keys, group, author, score, and current status
- Upvote writes back to a numeric column so cleanup and audits can sort by confidence
-
Filter by group, status, or category using any column from
wp_postmetaor services - Embed on a private compliance board or a marketing portal with a shortcode or block
- Bridges the gap between an engineering settings screen and the consent review legal needs
Features
What SleekView Feedback gives you for Borlabs Cookie
Consent services get a review
Every Borlabs Cookie service becomes a votable card. Legal, marketing, and engineering see which services the team trusts to keep enabled, which ones are scheduled for review, and which ones got retired. The board behaves like a quarterly consent review queue on top of Borlabs without extra tooling.
Retire requests stop vanishing
Tag a card with a Retire service category and the next reviewer picking up the board sees it next to the service. Status moves to Under review, the team votes on whether the tracker still earns its place in the consent banner, and the decision lives forever attached to the service it controls.
Audits start from a ranked list
Because votes write to the source meta, the next quarterly consent audit starts from a ranked list of services with confidence scores and notes. Legal sees the services the team defends and the ones flagged for retirement, which means the audit conversation starts much further along than usual.
Audience
How consent teams use the Borlabs board
Cross team consent review
Legal, marketing, and engineering share one board for every consent service. Anyone can flag a service, the team votes on whether it stays in its current group, and the queue stays sorted by signal instead of by whoever happened to add the tracker for a campaign two quarters ago.
Agency client compliance
Agencies that maintain Borlabs Cookie for clients share a filtered board per client. Senior consent leads spot stale services, legal can request retirements, and clients see the same audit ready board the agency uses, which makes the next compliance check much faster to defend.
Audit ready consent register
Each service carries a category, an author, a status, and a vote history, which is the shape a GDPR or ePrivacy audit wants when asking why each tracker is enabled and on what consent basis. The board doubles as the consent register without extra paperwork.
The bigger picture
Why a review board changes Borlabs operations
Cookie banners are one of those parts of the site that everyone assumes someone else is managing carefully. Marketing adds a new tag because a campaign needs it. Engineering adds a service because a feature requires a third party.
Legal asks once a year whether the consent banner reflects what is on the site, and the honest answer is usually no. Borlabs Cookie gives you all the tools to manage this well, but the management work itself is invisible to anyone except the engineer who configured the plugin. A review board changes the shape of that work.
Each service becomes a card the team votes on, tags, and either confirms or retires. Legal can flag concerns directly on the service. Marketing can argue for new trial tags in the open instead of via Slack.
Engineering can point at the rule that controls a tracker without explaining the Borlabs UI from scratch. Categories let the team slice the catalog by consent group. Status pills give the queue a shape.
Votes give an honest signal about which services the team still defends. Because everything writes back to the Borlabs store, the next quarterly consent audit starts from a ranked list with notes and not from a blank document. The end state is a consent setup that is defensible, reviewable, and small enough that the team can actually own it instead of inheriting it from whoever set it up last year.
Questions
Common questions about SleekView Feedback for Borlabs Cookie
It reads the live ones. SleekView Feedback sits on top of the Borlabs services post type and the relevant wp_postmeta rows. You map the columns once and the board renders directly from the source, so there is no syncing job, no ETL, and no duplicated consent catalog to keep in step with the live configuration on the site.
Yes. SleekView supports logged in voting for staff only views, so a legal reviewer can have a Subscriber level account that can vote on services and see the queue without ever reaching the Borlabs admin screens. Marketing leads can do the same on their side, and the board itself decides who sees what based on the role.
 Logged in voters get one vote per item per user ID, and there is a rate limit per IP. There is also a per role weighting option you can enable, so a legal vote on a Compliance card can count for more than a marketing vote on the same card, which keeps the consent debate honest and prevents simple vote stacking by the bigger team.
 Yes. SleekView accepts a WHERE clause when you wire up the data source, so you can scope the board to a specific group, a specific status, or a specific service type. Different pages can show different boards, which is how most consent teams build a marketing only view alongside the all services view that lives on the main page.
 Status is a column on the source post or meta row, so retiring a service on the board updates that column on the live record. Most teams pair that with a small filter that respects the Retired status when Borlabs renders services on the front end, so retiring a service on the board genuinely stops the script from loading.
 Yes. SleekView lets you flip the same data source between anonymous and logged in modes on different pages. A staff intranet can show the full service history and votes, while a public consent register can show only the service, the consent group, and the current status without exposing internal votes or notes from the team.
 It writes back to the source column, which means any custom Borlabs dashboards, scheduled cleanup jobs, or compliance reports can sort services by score. Several teams use the score to gate which services land in the quarterly consent register, which makes the board operational rather than a vanity counter next to the Borlabs admin.
 The view paginates server side and only loads the rows it needs to render the current page. SleekView uses any indexes you provide on the vote, status, and timestamp columns, which means even multi year Borlabs catalogs stay responsive on the board without forcing the consent team to spin up a separate review tool just for the cookie banner config.
 Pricing
More than 1000+
happy customers
Explore our flexible licensing options tailored to your needs. Upgrade your license anytime to access more features, or opt for a lifetime license for ongoing value, including lifetime updates and lifetime support. Our hassle-free upgrade process ensures that our platform can grow with you, starting from whichever plan you choose.
Lifetime ♾️
Most popular
EUR
once
- Unlimited websites
- Lifetime updates
- Lifetime support
...or get the Bundle Deal
and save €250 🎁
The Bundle (unlimited sites)
Pay once, own it forever
Elevate your WordPress site with our exclusive plugin bundle that includes all of our premium plugins in one package. Enjoy lifetime updates and lifetime support. Save significantly compared to buying plugins individually.
What’s included
-
SleekAI
-
SleekByte
-
SleekMotion
-
SleekPixel
-
SleekRank
-
SleekView
€749
Continue to checkout