✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount

SleekView Feedback for Glew

Glew pulls ecommerce data from your stores into customer, product, and cohort reports. SleekView Feedback turns those rows into a sortable, upvoteable board so store managers, marketers, and stakeholders can flag gaps in reporting, vote on the cohorts that need attention, and follow which fixes ship next.

♾️ Lifetime License available

SleekView Feedback board for Glew

From Glew reports to a votable feedback board

Glew aggregates ecommerce data from Shopify, WooCommerce, BigCommerce, and other stores into customer cohorts, product reports, and lifetime value dashboards. The data is rich but it lives inside the Glew app, behind a login that only the marketing analyst ever opens. Store managers, merchandisers, and the wider team have no shared place to react to the numbers or argue about what to do next.

SleekView Feedback reads any local mirror of your Glew data, including a synced custom post type for reports, a CSV pulled from the Glew API, or a custom table you fill from a scheduled export. It renders one card per report or cohort with title, vote count, author, category pill, and status pill. A vote button writes straight back to the vote_count column you wire up in WordPress.

You stop chasing report reactions through Slack screenshots and quarterly readouts. Marketers, merchandisers, and execs land on a clean board, upvote the cohorts they want fixed, flag the metrics that look wrong, and your reporting queue starts reflecting human priorities instead of whatever Glew happened to surface in the last automated email digest.

Workflow

From Glew rows to a public feedback board

1

Pick the Glew data source

Point SleekView at the table or post type mirroring your Glew data. Synced reports, cohort tables, or product attribution rows all work. Apply any WHERE clause to filter by store, segment, or date range so the board only shows the cohorts the team is actively reviewing this month.
2

Map votes, status, category

Choose which column counts as upvotes, which column carries the status label like Reviewing, Actioned, or Archived, and which column holds the category tag like Cohort, Product, or Channel. SleekView reads these on every page load so the board mirrors the latest Glew export.
3

Embed the feedback view

Drop the SleekView block on any page or use the shortcode. Visitors see a sorted feed of Glew reports with title, vote count, author, status pill, and category pill. Filters by category, status, and store work out of the box, and the board can stay internal or be shared with client stakeholders.
4

Votes write back to Glew rows

Every upvote increments the vote column on the source row. That means your weekly Glew digest, your own queries, and any cohort dashboards can sort by score, push high voted reports to the top of the review cycle, and retire ones the team agreed are no longer worth tracking.

Sample board

Sample Glew customer board

A peek at how recent Glew reports and cohorts look when they land on a SleekView Feedback board, with cohort review requests, attribution questions, and merchandising ideas mixed together.
263 votes
First time buyer cohort LTV dropped 22% last month
Nadia O. Bug Investigating
176 votes
Add a cohort report for subscribers who pause after month 2
@retentionleo Feature request Planned
144 votes
Product attribution for influencer codes looks doubled up
Henrik J. Bug In progress
97 votes
Show top SKUs by repeat purchase on the dashboard
@merchpia Idea New
48 votes
Holiday cohort report from last year shipped on time
Quentin R. Praise Shipped
6 votes
Pull TikTok Shop store data into the channel report
@growthbea Idea Closed

Comparison

Glew dashboard vs SleekView Feedback

Glew default dashboard

  • Reports sit behind a Glew login that only the analytics team ever opens
  • No way for merchandisers or stakeholders to upvote cohorts worth reviewing
  • Attribution questions live in Slack screenshots, not next to the cohort row
  • Status of each report request is invisible to the wider commerce team
  • No public queue showing clients which cohorts are queued, actioned, or dropped

SleekView Feedback

  • One card per Glew report or cohort with title, votes, status pill, and category tag
  • Upvote writes back to the source column so digests can sort by team score
  • Filter by store, channel, or status using any column already in wp_postmeta
  • Embed on an internal commerce dashboard or share with clients via a login
  • Marketers stop debating in Slack and start voting on which cohorts to action

Features

What SleekView Feedback gives you for Glew

Cohort voting built in

Each Glew cohort becomes a votable card. Marketers see which cohorts the merchandising team wants fixed, which attribution reports look broken, and which segments already moved into action. The board acts as a living queue of commerce priorities without anyone touching a spreadsheet.

Attribution flags inline

Add an Attribution issue category to the board and any teammate can flag a Glew report that looks doubled up or undercounted. The flag lives next to the report row, so the analyst who fixes the source can see it without leaving WordPress and hunting in the Glew app.

Upvotes feed back into digests

Because votes write to the source column, you can sort Glew digests and weekly reviews by score, push high voted cohorts to the top of the action list, and retire reports the team chose not to pursue. Commerce prioritisation stops being a meeting and becomes a sortable column.

Audience

How teams use the Glew feedback board

Merchandising priority queue

Merchandisers upvote the Glew cohorts and SKU reports they want to act on next. The board replaces a long email chain and gives the head of commerce one screen to plan the next merchandising sprint, with vote counts and status pills already in place.

Client facing performance log

Agencies share the board with brand clients so they can vote on which cohorts to invest in next quarter. Clients see exactly what is being actioned and feel in control without ever opening the Glew app or wading through a dozen exported CSVs.

Attribution QA queue

Analytics teams use the board as an attribution QA queue. Anything flagged with a high vote count gets reviewed first, and fixed reports move to an Actioned status so the audit trail is visible without trawling Glew dashboards or shared docs.

The bigger picture

Why a Glew feedback board changes the workflow

Glew is great at building cohorts. It is much worse at telling you which of those cohorts should drive the next campaign. Most teams end up with a digest that only the analyst opens and a Slack channel full of merchandiser opinions, and the two never meet.

Marketers miss the cohorts that need attention, attribution stays subtly wrong, and clients lose trust because nobody can show them what was actioned. A feedback board changes that pattern. Reports stop being throwaway emails and start being something the team and the client react to in public.

Upvotes give you a cheap, honest signal about which cohorts deserve a campaign. Status pills give you a backlog sorted by impact instead of by whoever shouted loudest in the last weekly. And because everything writes back to the source row, the next Glew digest already reflects what the team agreed on.

The result is fewer stale reports, fewer arguments about attribution, and a much shorter loop between the cohort you spotted today and the campaign that ships tomorrow.

Questions

Common questions about SleekView Feedback for Glew

No. SleekView Feedback reads directly from whatever table or post type you use to mirror Glew data in WordPress. You point it at the source, pick the columns for votes, status, category, author, and title, and the board renders. No ETL job, no sync, no duplicated data. Anything Glew writes shows up on the next load.

 

Yes. SleekView only needs a WordPress account, and merchandisers can be members or contributors without paying for an extra Glew seat. They open the board, upvote the cohort card, and the vote writes back to the same row the analytics team reviews in Glew itself the next day.

 

Each logged in user is tracked by user ID, and anonymous voters are scoped by cookie token. The plugin also exposes a rate limit so a single IP cannot spam the board, which is enough to keep both internal and client facing boards honest without forcing extra friction.

 

Yes. SleekView accepts a WHERE clause when you wire up the data source, so you can scope the board to a single Shopify store, a particular channel, a date range, or any combination of meta fields you already store. Different boards on different pages can use different filters.

 

Attribution issue is just a category value on the row. You can write it into a meta key you already use or a dedicated column. Either way it shows up in the WordPress admin alongside the report, so the analyst who reviews Glew can see the flag without ever leaving WordPress.

 

They write back to the source column in WordPress, which means your Glew digests, scheduled exports, and any of your own queries can sort by that score. Several teams use the score to gate which cohorts get actioned first, which makes the board operational and not just a vanity widget.

 

Both. SleekView ships as a Gutenberg block, an Elementor widget, a Bricks element, and a classic shortcode. Theme developers can also call the render function from PHP and pass a configuration array, so you can mount the board on any template without touching the page editor.

 

The view paginates server side and only loads the rows it needs to render the current page. Indexed columns stay fast even on long tables. For really big stores, scoping the board by channel or campaign keeps both the query and the audience focused, so the page feels snappy even at scale.

 

Pricing

More than 1000+
happy customers

Explore our flexible licensing options tailored to your needs. Upgrade your license anytime to access more features, or opt for a lifetime license for ongoing value, including lifetime updates and lifetime support. Our hassle-free upgrade process ensures that our platform can grow with you, starting from whichever plan you choose.

Starter

€79

EUR

per year

  • 3 websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Pro

€149

EUR

per year

  • Unlimited websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Lifetime ♾️

Most popular

€249

EUR

once

  • Unlimited websites
  • Lifetime updates
  • Lifetime support

...or get the Bundle Deal
and save €250 🎁

The Bundle (unlimited sites)

Pay once, own it forever

Elevate your WordPress site with our exclusive plugin bundle that includes all of our premium plugins in one package. Enjoy lifetime updates and lifetime support. Save significantly compared to buying plugins individually.

What’s included

  • SleekAI

  • SleekByte

  • SleekMotion

  • SleekPixel

  • SleekRank

  • SleekView