✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount

SleekView Feedback for Advanced Access Manager

Advanced Access Manager stores roles, capabilities, and JSON access policies inside WordPress. SleekView Feedback turns those rules into a sortable board so admins, security leads, and stakeholders can upvote the policies that work, flag risky ones, and watch fixes ship instead of arguing in Slack.

♾️ Lifetime License available

SleekView Feedback board for Advanced Access Manager

From AAM policies to a reviewable board

Advanced Access Manager keeps roles, capabilities, and JSON access policies in custom tables and post types alongside the usual wp_users and wp_usermeta. The admin screens are good for editing one rule at a time, but they were never designed for a team to review the whole policy surface together. Risky rules get added, default capability tweaks pile up, and no one can show a security lead which policies are deliberate and which were one off experiments.

SleekView Feedback reads the AAM policy post type or any saved query against wp_posts and wp_postmeta and renders each rule as a card. You map a vote column for upvotes, a status column for labels like Active, Under review, or Retired, and a category column for tags like role, capability, or policy. From there, anyone on the team can vote on rules, flag the ones that look too permissive, and watch each policy move through review.

You stop guessing which capability tweaks are still wanted, and the security review meeting starts from a ranked list instead of a fresh blank page.

Workflow

From AAM rules to a public review board

1

Point at AAM policies

Connect SleekView to the AAM access policy post type or to a custom query against wp_posts and wp_postmeta. Add a WHERE clause to scope by policy type, role, or environment so the board only shows the rules your team actually owns.
2

Map vote, status, category

Pick the numeric column that should count as upvotes, the column that holds status labels like Active, Under review, or Retired, and the column that carries the rule type. SleekView reads these on every page load so the board reflects whatever the team did last.
3

Embed the review board

Drop the SleekView block on an internal review page. Visitors see one card per AAM rule with title, owner, target role, status pill, and category pill. The board paginates, filters by role and status, and can be locked behind a login for sensitive policy work.
4

Votes write back to AAM

Every upvote increments the column on the source row, so the next time you query AAM policies in PHP or in the admin, you can sort by score, prioritise the rules the team wants kept, and quietly retire the ones nobody endorses.

Sample board

Sample AAM policy review board

A peek at how AAM roles, capability tweaks, and JSON access policies look on a SleekView Feedback board, with risky rule reports and requests for safer defaults mixed together.
294 votes
Editor role can publish without review, should we tighten this
Sara H. Risky rule Investigating
176 votes
Add a default policy that blocks plugin install on staging roles
@securityleo Rule request Planned
138 votes
Custom Shop Manager capability set is great, please document it
Daniela P. Praise Active
102 votes
JSON policy for client portal users is too permissive on uploads
@agencyalex Policy In review
47 votes
Retire the legacy 2019 Author override, nobody seems to use it
Tomas R. Cleanup Retired
9 votes
Backend menu hiding rule broke after AAM update last week
@helpdesktom Bug Open

Comparison

AAM admin vs SleekView Feedback

AAM default screens

  • Policies sit in admin tabs that only the lead admin ever opens for review
  • No way for stakeholders to upvote the rules they want kept across deploys
  • Risky rule reports live in Slack screenshots, not next to the policy row
  • Status of each rule is implicit in who edited it last, with no shared view
  • Rule retirement gets postponed because no one wants to be the one to delete it

SleekView Feedback

  • One card per AAM rule with title, target role, status pill, and category tag
  • Upvote writes back to a column so your own queries can sort policies by score
  • Filter by role, capability, or policy type using any field on wp_posts
  • Embed on an internal review page or a client portal with a shortcode or block
  • Replaces the security review meeting with a ranked, owned, dated review queue

Features

What SleekView Feedback gives you for Advanced Access Manager

Policy review built in

Every AAM access policy becomes a votable card. Security leads see which policies the team endorses, which ones are flagged as risky, and which ones get retired. The board acts as a living changelog of your access model without anyone hand maintaining a doc.

Risky rule reports inline

Add a Risky rule category and any admin can flag a policy that looks too permissive. The flag lives on the policy row, so the engineer who owns the rule sees the concern without leaving WordPress. Reviews stop being calendar invites and start being a queue.

Scores guide cleanup

Because votes write to the source column, you can sort the policy list by score in any AAM query. High score rules stay, low score rules get a retirement review, and the access model trends toward something the whole team actually agrees with.

Audience

How teams use the AAM feedback board

Security review queue

Security leads run quarterly reviews against the ranked policy board instead of dumping AAM exports into a spreadsheet. Each rule has an owner, a status, and a vote count, so the review meeting starts with a clear agenda.

Agency client signoff

Agencies share the board with clients so they can sign off on the role and policy set running on their site. Clients see exactly which rules are active, vote on what should change, and feel in control without ever opening AAM directly.

Capability cleanup drives

Engineering teams use the board to run a one off capability cleanup. Anything below a threshold goes into a Retired status, anything above stays, and the team has a shared queue that everyone can vote on instead of one person guessing.

The bigger picture

Why a votable AAM review changes the workflow

Advanced Access Manager is powerful precisely because it lets you tweak any capability, override any role, and write JSON policies for almost anything. Over a year or two, that power turns into clutter. Capability overrides pile up, roles drift, and nobody can say with confidence which rules are deliberate and which were a one off experiment that never got cleaned up.

Most teams handle this with an annual review meeting, a spreadsheet export, and a lot of guesswork. A feedback board changes the shape of that work. Each rule becomes a card the team and the stakeholders react to in public.

Upvotes give you an honest signal about which rules people want kept. Risky rule flags give you a backlog sorted by impact instead of by whoever shouted loudest in the last meeting. And because everything writes back to the source row, the next time you query AAM policies in code or in the admin, the ranking is already there.

The result is a leaner access model, fewer accidental over permissive rules, and a review process that anyone in the team can join without learning the AAM admin first.

Questions

Common questions about SleekView Feedback for Advanced Access Manager

No. SleekView Feedback reads directly from the AAM access policy post type and from wp_postmeta. You point it at the source, pick the columns for votes, status, category, and owner, and the board renders. No ETL job, no sync, no duplicated rules. Anything you change in AAM shows up on the next page load.

 

Yes. SleekView ships with anonymous voting backed by cookies, plus a logged in mode that respects WordPress capabilities. Most teams run a private review board behind a login wall, but the same view supports a public client portal with read only voting if that fits your workflow.

 

Each visitor gets a cookie scoped vote token per item, and logged in users are tracked by user ID. The plugin also exposes a rate limit so a single IP cannot spam the board, which keeps internal review boards honest without forcing extra signup steps.

 

Yes. SleekView accepts a WHERE clause when you wire up the data source, so you can scope the board to policies targeting a specific role, a specific capability, or a specific environment. Different pages can show different boards, which is how teams run per role review queues.

 

Risky rule is just a category value on the row. You can write it into a meta key the AAM post type already exposes or a dedicated column. Either way, the value shows up next to the rule in the AAM admin, so the engineer who owns the policy can see the flag without opening a separate ticket.

 

They write back to the source column, which means any of your own queries, custom dashboards, or scheduled cleanups can sort policies by score. Several teams use the score to gate which rules get archived during quarterly cleanups, which makes the board operational rather than decorative.

 

Both. SleekView ships as a Gutenberg block, an Elementor widget, a Bricks element, and a classic shortcode. Theme developers can also call the render function from PHP and pass a configuration array, so you can mount the board on any template, including a custom AAM dashboard tab.

 

The view paginates server side and only loads the rows it needs for the current page. You can index the vote, status, and timestamp columns, and SleekView will use them. Multisite installs with thousands of policies across networks run the board without measurable load on the AAM tables.

 

Pricing

More than 1000+
happy customers

Explore our flexible licensing options tailored to your needs. Upgrade your license anytime to access more features, or opt for a lifetime license for ongoing value, including lifetime updates and lifetime support. Our hassle-free upgrade process ensures that our platform can grow with you, starting from whichever plan you choose.

Starter

€79

EUR

per year

  • 3 websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Pro

€149

EUR

per year

  • Unlimited websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Lifetime ♾️

Most popular

€249

EUR

once

  • Unlimited websites
  • Lifetime updates
  • Lifetime support

...or get the Bundle Deal
and save €250 🎁

The Bundle (unlimited sites)

Pay once, own it forever

Elevate your WordPress site with our exclusive plugin bundle that includes all of our premium plugins in one package. Enjoy lifetime updates and lifetime support. Save significantly compared to buying plugins individually.

What’s included

  • SleekAI

  • SleekByte

  • SleekMotion

  • SleekPixel

  • SleekRank

  • SleekView