✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount

SleekView Feedback for Internal Link Juicer

Internal Link Juicer stores keyword rules and per post link targets in custom tables. SleekView Feedback turns those rules into a sortable, upvoteable board so editors vote on which keywords to link, flag redirect loops on link targets, and request schema or sitemap work.

♾️ Lifetime License available

SleekView Feedback board for Internal Link Juicer

From Juicer keyword rules to a feedback board

Internal Link Juicer writes every keyword rule and per post link target to the ilj_link_index and ilj_keywords tables. The admin lets you edit one keyword set at a time, but the team has no shared view of which keywords actually link to useful canonical pages, which targets now 301 to a new URL, or which deserve schema and sitemap follow up.

SleekView Feedback reads the Juicer tables directly. Point it at ilj_link_index or a custom join with wp_posts, map a numeric column to votes, the link target post type to category, and the rule health to the status pill. Each keyword rule becomes one card with keyword, target, vote count, and status the team can triage together.

SEO leads stop chasing individual rules. They land on a sorted board, upvote the keywords that need stronger anchor text, flag the rule that points to a 301 chain, and request schema and sitemap follow up for new pillar pages. The internal link roadmap stops being a hunch and becomes a votable backlog tied to rules already in the database.

Workflow

From Juicer rules to a public board

1

Pick the Juicer source

Point SleekView at ilj_link_index or a custom join with wp_posts. Filter by target post type, keyword pattern, or link count so the board surfaces only the rules the SEO team needs to triage during this internal link sprint.
2

Map vote, status, category

Choose which numeric column counts as upvotes, which carries the rule health like Live, Loop, or Stale, and which holds the link target type or section. SleekView reads these live so the board reflects whatever Internal Link Juicer indexed last.
3

Embed the feedback view

Drop the SleekView block on an internal SEO page or use the shortcode. Editors see a sorted feed of keyword rules with keyword, target, vote count, status pill, and section pill. The board paginates, filters by status, and runs on phones.
4

Votes write back to Juicer

Every upvote increments the score column on the source rule. That means Internal Link Juicer itself starts ranking which keywords matter, so you can sort the rule list by score, fix high voted rules first, and quietly retire keywords nobody actually links.

Sample board

Sample Internal Link Juicer board

A peek at how recent Juicer keyword rules look on a SleekView Feedback board, with broken target reports, schema requests, sitemap follow ups, and stronger anchor text votes mixed in.
234 votes
Keyword rule for SEO audit now links to a 301 chain not the new canonical
Helena R. Bug Investigating
168 votes
Use stronger anchor text variants for the keyword rule on pricing pages
@seomarco Idea Planned
126 votes
Add new pillar comparison pages to sitemap after linking spike lands
Priya N. Sitemap In progress
81 votes
Add Article schema with related links to JSON-LD for top linked pages
Tomasz K. Schema New
44 votes
Indexer rebuild time dropped noticeably after the last batching update
@iljannika Praise Shipped
11 votes
Regex keyword groups for product variants in the next rule editor
Lukas W. Idea New

Comparison

Juicer admin vs SleekView Feedback

Juicer default screens

  • Rule list is built for editing one keyword at a time, with no shared signal
  • No way for editors to upvote which keywords need stronger anchor text now
  • Schema and sitemap follow up lives in Slack threads, not next to the rule
  • Status of each rule sits in row meta with no shared front end view in admin
  • No public queue to show clients which internal link work shipped this sprint

SleekView Feedback

  • One card per Juicer keyword rule with keyword, target, votes, status, and section
  • Upvote writes back to the score column so the rule list sorts by team priority
  • Filter by target post type, keyword pattern, or status using ilj_link_index
  • Embed on an internal SEO page or behind a login with one shortcode or block
  • SEO leads stop chasing one rule at a time and start voting in WordPress

Features

What SleekView Feedback gives you for Internal Link Juicer

Rule review built in

Each Juicer keyword rule becomes a votable card. SEO leads see which rules earn links, which point to 301 chains, and which were retired. The board doubles as a living changelog of internal link decisions without keeping a separate planning doc of anchor text.

Redirect and schema flags

Add Loop, Schema, or Sitemap categories and editors flag any rule with one click. The flag lives next to the source row, so the SEO lead can fix the link target, update the JSON-LD, and add the sitemap entry in one focused sprint.

Upvotes feed back into rules

Because votes write to the source column, you can sort the Juicer rule list by score, fix high voted rules first, and quietly retire keywords nobody links. Internal link work stops being a guess and becomes a prioritised number in the database.

Audience

How SEO teams use the Internal Link Juicer board

Editorial link planning

Editors run a board to vote on which keywords should link to which pillar pages. The team ships top voted rules first, low impact ones fall to the bottom, and link planning stops drifting across spreadsheets.

Redirect chain audit

Agencies use the board to flag rules that point to 301 chains. Top voted ones get updated to point at the new canonical, and the board moves them to Clean so the audit trail stays visible to the agency lead.

Schema and sitemap sync

Editors flag rules whose targets need schema or sitemap updates. The SEO lead lands JSON-LD, sitemap, and Juicer changes together in one sprint instead of chasing three plugin queues for the same canonical page.

The bigger picture

Why an Internal Link Juicer board changes the workflow

Internal Link Juicer is great at indexing keyword rules across thousands of posts. It is much worse at telling you which rules push readers to a useful canonical page, which now link through stale 301 chains, and which keywords still need stronger anchor variants. Most teams end up with hundreds of rules and no honest signal about which ones earn real ranking or click impact.

Editors miss the rule that started linking to a redirect chain after a slug change, SEO leads ship sprints that tweak low impact keywords first, and clients lose trust because nobody can show them which internal link work shipped last week. A feedback board changes that pattern. Juicer rules stop being silent admin entries and start being something the team reacts to in public.

Upvotes give a cheap, honest signal about which keywords deserve sprint time. Loop, schema, and sitemap flags give you a backlog sorted by impact, not by whoever opened Juicer last. And because everything writes back to the source row, the next time someone opens the rule list it shows the team score next to the keyword.

The result is fewer broken link targets and a shorter loop between an idea today and a clean rule tomorrow.

Questions

Common questions about SleekView Feedback for Internal Link Juicer

No. SleekView Feedback reads directly from the Juicer tables and the WordPress posts table. You point it at the source, pick the columns for votes, status, category, target, and keyword, and the board renders. No ETL, no sync, no duplicated data. Anything Juicer indexes shows up on the next page load.

 

Yes. SleekView ships with anonymous voting backed by cookies, so any reviewer can upvote rules without an account. You can also require login if you want the board restricted to SEO leads or content editors, and the same view handles both modes with a single toggle.

 

SleekView tracks votes by cookie for anonymous reviewers and by user ID for logged in editors. A second click on the same card removes the vote instead of adding another one, so the count stays honest and the Juicer score reflects unique voters, not raw clicks.

 

Yes. The data source supports any WHERE clause. You can filter by target post type, by keyword pattern, by link count, or by any meta key, then save that filtered view as a board for a specific section, audit, or client retainer without changing Juicer settings.

 

No. Votes only write to a score meta column. The rule logic itself never changes. The SEO lead decides which votes get acted on, so the board acts as a prioritised backlog while Juicer stays the single source of truth for what gets linked in published content.

 

Yes. Add Schema, Sitemap, and Redirect categories so editors flag any rule with the type of follow up needed. The board surfaces all three workstreams together, so the SEO lead can land the JSON-LD fix, the 301, and the sitemap entry in one focused sprint.

 

Yes. The Feedback view is responsive by default. Cards stack to one column on small screens, the vote button stays thumb sized, and category and status pills wrap cleanly. Lazy loaded keyword previews keep the page light on a slow connection.

 

The card disappears on the next page load because the board reads live data. The votes recorded against the source rule stay in meta until you delete them, so if you ever re-add the same keyword the score and history come back attached to the new rule row.

 

Pricing

More than 1000+
happy customers

Explore our flexible licensing options tailored to your needs. Upgrade your license anytime to access more features, or opt for a lifetime license for ongoing value, including lifetime updates and lifetime support. Our hassle-free upgrade process ensures that our platform can grow with you, starting from whichever plan you choose.

Starter

€79

EUR

per year

  • 3 websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Pro

€149

EUR

per year

  • Unlimited websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Lifetime ♾️

Most popular

€249

EUR

once

  • Unlimited websites
  • Lifetime updates
  • Lifetime support

...or get the Bundle Deal
and save €250 🎁

The Bundle (unlimited sites)

Pay once, own it forever

Elevate your WordPress site with our exclusive plugin bundle that includes all of our premium plugins in one package. Enjoy lifetime updates and lifetime support. Save significantly compared to buying plugins individually.

What’s included

  • SleekAI

  • SleekByte

  • SleekMotion

  • SleekPixel

  • SleekRank

  • SleekView