No. Notice-doctrine interpretation, comparative-negligence analysis, and liability assessment are explicitly listed as declined categories in the system prompt. Those depend on jurisdiction, facts, and the venue's policies. The bot captures the structural intake (incident report, photos, witness contact, hazard description) and routes to a free contingency consultation. Audit the refusal quarterly with adversarial prompts ("hypothetically would they be on the hook", "is the case worth pursuing") to confirm the guardrail holds across phrasings.

The bot recognises premises-liability time pressure (most retail and hotel surveillance rolls on a 30-day cycle, some venues have 7-day or 14-day windows) and escalates the booking posture so the case-screening attorney can send a preservation letter inside the retention window. The system prompt does not promise specific preservation outcomes; that's an attorney call. It captures the urgency signal and routes accordingly. For incidents older than 30 days, the prompt adjusts the framing to be realistic about preservation status.

Yes. Multibot or venue-aware intake routes by venue type because the notice posture, insurer pattern, and applicable standards differ. Grocery stores often have wet-floor policies and routine inspection logs that drive notice analysis. Hotels have housekeeping records and guest-incident protocols. Apartment buildings involve landlord-tenant duties that overlap with premises liability. The bot captures the venue type and the case-screening attorney walks into the consultation with the right context for the segment.

Yes, with state-specific intake fields. Some states recognise a natural-accumulation defence that limits property-owner duty for ice and snow; others do not. The bot captures whether the incident involved natural accumulation, mechanical accumulation, or a defect in the surface, and routes to attorneys familiar with the state's framework. The bot does not interpret the defence's applicability; that's an attorney call. The intake gives the screening attorney the structured facts to evaluate.

Yes. Many premises-liability practices serve significant Spanish-speaking communities, particularly for grocery and apartment-building incidents. SleekAI replies in the language the visitor writes in. The booked consultation flags preferred language so the attorney prepares accordingly. Legal-advice refusal language remains intact across translation because the prompt rules apply in any language. For markets with Mandarin, Vietnamese, Tagalog, or Korean speakers, the same multilingual capability extends naturally.

BYO API key with the standard terms means data is not used for training by default. Conversation logs live in your WordPress database. For premises-liability practices the typical posture is medium-length retention with structured handoff to the case-management system once an engagement starts. Document the bot in your privacy notice and align retention with engagement-letter terms. The plugin provides the building blocks; the policy posture is the firm's, aligned to the records-retention requirements of your jurisdiction.

The bot captures the structural inputs the case-screening team uses: injury severity, treatment status, time since incident, incident-report posture, photo evidence, venue type. It does not make the viability decision. The intake gives the screening attorney the structured fields before the call so low-viability matters get a decline letter rather than a 30-minute call. High-severity matters with strong structural inputs (recent incident, photo evidence, witness contact, severe injury) get prioritised in the case-screening queue.

Government-property matters have additional procedural layers: notice-of-claim requirements with short statutory windows, sovereign-immunity considerations, and venue-specific filing rules. The bot recognises government-property indicators (city building, post office, courthouse, school, transit station) and routes to attorneys experienced with the notice-of-claim process. The bot does not interpret the notice-of-claim deadlines; that's an attorney call. The intake escalates the booking posture because notice-of-claim windows are often 60-90 days, which is tight compared to the standard PI statute of limitations.