No. The system prompt explicitly restricts the bot from giving legal advice on specific matters. It describes practice areas, fee structures, consultation logistics, and general process timing, then routes anything matter-specific to a consultation. For prospects with urgent disputes (active eviction filing, pending closing problems, eminent domain notice), the bot prioritises routing to an attorney within 24 hours rather than answering substantively.

At the basic level, yes. The bot asks opposing party name, current attorney representation, and whether the prospect has spoken to the firm before, then runs that against your published conflicts list or via a webhook to your conflicts database. Definitive conflict clearance always requires firm-side review before engagement letters are sent, but the chatbot screens out obvious conflicts before booking a consultation slot.

SleekAI hands off via webhook to anything that accepts JSON. Clio, MyCase, PracticePanther, Smokeball, and Cosmolex all accept structured intake from external systems. The webhook payload includes matter type, jurisdiction, opposing party, transaction or dispute status, and the transcript, so the receiving system has the intake already populated when the attorney opens the matter file.

Yes. Multibot scopes each chatbot to a practice area, an office, or an individual attorney. A residential closings attorney can run a chatbot separate from a commercial leasing attorney, each with its own intake fields and consultation calendar. For solo practitioners running multiple practice areas, a single bot with practice-area branching is usually simpler.

If you publish your jurisdiction coverage with attorney-state status (Massachusetts, Georgia, South Carolina, Delaware), the bot reads it and answers accordingly. A Massachusetts buyer is told they will need an attorney; a Texas buyer is told that the title company conducts the closing but they can engage an attorney for representation as desired. Multi-state firms get accurate state-specific answers without manual lookup.

The bot detects urgency keywords (eviction filed, closing tomorrow, lender denied, eminent domain notice) and routes to an attorney's emergency intake rather than a standard consultation slot. For active eviction or unlawful detainer matters, the bot can also surface the relevant state's tenant-rights hotline if your firm publishes one as a referral, which is the responsible answer for prospects who genuinely cannot afford counsel.

Stored in WordPress with the page URL, matter ID if assigned, and visitor metadata attached for attorney review. SleekAI uses your own OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or OpenRouter API key, and standard API terms exclude conversation data from model training. Conversations covered by attorney-client privilege only attach privilege once an engagement letter is signed, which the bot makes clear in the consultation booking flow. Pre-engagement chats are not privileged and the bot states that explicitly.

At the general level, yes. The bot describes what a partition action is (forced sale or division of jointly-owned property), what eminent domain involves (government taking with just compensation), and typical timelines for each, all from your published practice-area pages. Specific matter advice always routes to consultation. The bot's job is to help prospects understand whether their situation matches a practice area before booking, not to substitute for legal counsel.