✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount

AI Chatbot for Internal Security Incident Reporting

SleekAI walks staff through a guided incident report, classifies severity from the answers, logs the case with reporter user ID and full chat context, and pings the security team via webhook within seconds of submission. Bring your own OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or OpenRouter API key.

♾️ Lifetime License available

SleekAI chatbot for Security Incident Reporting Chatbot

Phishing reports lose half their value when reporting is a chore

The fastest way to contain a security incident is to know about it. The fastest way to know about it is to make reporting easy. Most companies fail this test badly: the reporting form is buried three clicks deep in the intranet, asks for fifteen fields including ones nobody knows how to fill in, and sends the result to a generic mailbox that nobody reads in real time. So employees see a suspicious email, hesitate, decide it's probably nothing, and don't report. The breach window stays open.

SleekAI runs a guided incident chat. An employee types 'I think I clicked a phishing link' and the bot asks a short series of triaging questions: which link, what site loaded, did you enter credentials, on which device, are you still on the network. From the answers, it classifies severity (low / medium / high / critical) and writes a row to wp_sleek_ai_incidents with the reporter user ID, the classification, the answers, and the full transcript. Critical incidents trigger a PagerDuty webhook within seconds.

The chat-driven flow makes reporting feel like a conversation, not paperwork. Staff who would never finish a 15-field form happily answer six questions in sequence. The bot also reduces false alarms by asking clarifying questions: a phishing report where the user didn't click anything gets routed differently than one where credentials were entered. The security team receives triaged incidents with context, not a stack of underspecified emails to interpret. Mean time to detect drops because reports actually arrive.

Workflow

How the incident bot triages a report

1

Open with an empathetic prompt

The bot acknowledges the report and asks a focused first question. Tone matters because staff are often anxious when reporting. A warm, brief opening keeps them engaged through the rest of the triage flow without making them feel interrogated.
2

Run the triage decision tree

Short follow-up questions narrow the severity. Did you enter credentials, on what device, are you on the corporate network, what time did this happen. The model uses the encoded rubric in the system instruction to map answers to a severity tier.
3

Classify and act immediately

The classification fires the right webhook (low → tracking queue, medium → security email, high → Slack channel, critical → PagerDuty). At the same time, the bot gives the user containment steps to take right now while the team is being notified.
4

Log the structured record

User ID, classification, answers, transcript, timestamps, and IP save to the incidents table. The dashboard updates, the on-call sees a link to the conversation, and the post-incident review later has a replayable artifact. No detail gets lost in the handoff.

Try it now

A typical security incident report

An employee thinks they may have clicked a phishing link and reports it via chat.

Comparison

Generic chatbot vs SleekAI for security incident reporting

Generic chatbot

  • Cannot classify incident severity from answers
  • Doesn't trigger pager alerts for critical reports
  • Has no link to internal user identity
  • Misses the chance to give immediate self-help steps
  • Captures incomplete reports and frustrates security

SleekAI chatbot

  • Classifies severity from a short Q&A flow
  • Logs reporter, transcript, classification, timestamp
  • Fires PagerDuty or Slack alerts on critical reports
  • Gives immediate self-help steps in the same chat
  • Tracks incidents for trend reporting and metrics

Features

What SleekAI gives you for Security Incident Reporting Chatbot

Severity triage built in

The bot asks the right follow-up questions and classifies low / medium / high / critical based on the answers. No-credential phishing click is low, credentials entered on a corporate device is high, suspected active intrusion is critical. Each tier routes differently.

Instant alert path

Critical incidents trigger a PagerDuty, Opsgenie, or Slack webhook within seconds of the bot's classification. The security on-call sees the alert with a link to the chat transcript. Mean time to response shrinks from hours to minutes.

Immediate self-help

The bot tells the employee what to do right now: reset your password, disconnect the device, freeze the affected account. This containment-first guidance reduces blast radius even before the security team has read the alert.

Use cases

Common incident types the bot handles

Phishing reports

The most common category. Bot asks if the user clicked, if credentials were entered, and on which device. Severity scales accordingly, and the report links to the suspicious sender for downstream blocking and DMARC tuning.

Lost or stolen devices

A panicked employee at the airport types 'I lost my laptop'. The bot captures location, time, device model, and whether disk encryption was active. Security can remote-wipe immediately if MDM is in place, often before the device leaves the airport.

Suspicious account activity

Login alerts from unfamiliar locations, MFA prompts the user didn't initiate, unexpected SaaS access notifications. The bot triages whether the user is the source and pages the team if not. Account-takeover attempts get caught early.

The bigger picture

Why low-friction incident reporting changes containment

Security teams operate on a simple constraint: they can only respond to incidents they know about. Every hour of unreported breach activity expands the impact. The biggest lever a company has on incident severity is shortening the gap between when something bad happens and when the security team finds out.

Reporting forms that take five minutes to fill out and require fifteen fields are friction that costs real money in extended breach windows. Chat-based reporting collapses the friction. An employee mid-panic types one sentence and the bot guides them through the rest.

The total elapsed time from suspicion to triaged-and-paged is usually under two minutes. Compare that to the form-based alternative where the employee opens a tab, finds the form, gives up, sends a Slack DM to IT, IT sees it forty minutes later, asks for details, the employee responds an hour after that, and so on. The classification logic in the system instruction also makes the security team's life saner.

They stop receiving 'I got a weird email' tickets that take ten minutes each to triage. They start receiving structured cases with severity labels and full context. The team's capacity for actual incident response work expands accordingly.

Mean time to detect (MTTD) and mean time to respond (MTTR) both drop measurably within weeks of deploying this pattern. Insurance carriers and SOC2 auditors notice the difference. A documented reporting flow with logged classifications and webhook-driven escalation is the kind of control that scores well on assessments.

The audit trail is also defensible if anything ever does go wrong: you can show exactly when the incident was reported, how it was classified, and what the response timeline looked like. That kind of clarity is worth a lot when the stakes are high.

Questions

Common questions about SleekAI for Security Incident Reporting Chatbot

The system instruction encodes the company's incident classification rubric: which combinations of factors map to which severity tier. The model applies the rubric to the answers the user gives, producing a tier label. The classification is logged and can be overridden by the security team on review.

 

An immediate webhook fires to PagerDuty, Opsgenie, Slack, or whatever your incident response tool is. The bot also gives the user immediate containment steps (disconnect, reset password, freeze account) so the blast radius shrinks even before the on-call engineer reads the alert.

 

Each incident creates a row with reporter user ID, classification, the answers to each triage question, the full transcript, timestamps, and the user's IP. Optionally, the bot can also link to MDM device records or SIEM events for cross-referencing during the post-incident review.

 

Yes, with a separate bot instance on an anonymous reporting page. Conversations save without user metadata. This is useful for sensitive insider-threat scenarios where the reporter shouldn't be identified, though it limits how much immediate self-help the bot can offer.

 

The bot's clarifying questions reduce noise dramatically. A 'this email looks weird' report where the user didn't click anything classifies as low and routes to a tuning queue rather than paging on-call. Security gets context-rich reports instead of an inbox of underspecified one-liners to triage manually.

 

Yes via webhook. Every incident can post to Splunk, Sumo Logic, Jira, Linear, or ServiceNow with the structured payload. Most security teams keep the SleekAI table as the system of record for the human-side report and link out to the SIEM for technical evidence.

 

The dashboard shows incident counts per week, classified by severity and department. Comparing to known phishing campaign sends (or red-team exercises) reveals the actual reporting rate. Most companies see reporting rates climb significantly within a quarter of replacing forms with chat.

 

Tamper-evident logging, role scoping, and audit-grade transcripts make the bot suitable for SOX, HIPAA, and PCI-relevant incident reporting. The data lives on infrastructure you control, and the audit trail is a SQL query away. Specific regulatory mappings depend on your jurisdiction and policies.

 

Pricing

More than 1000+
happy customers

Explore our flexible licensing options tailored to your needs. Upgrade your license anytime to access more features, or opt for a lifetime license for ongoing value, including lifetime updates and lifetime support. Our hassle-free upgrade process ensures that our platform can grow with you, starting from whichever plan you choose.

Starter

€79

EUR

per year

  • 3 websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Pro

€149

EUR

per year

  • Unlimited websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Lifetime ♾️

Most popular

€249

EUR

once

  • Unlimited websites
  • Lifetime updates
  • Lifetime support

...or get the Bundle Deal
and save €250 🎁

The Bundle (unlimited sites)

Pay once, own it forever

Elevate your WordPress site with our exclusive plugin bundle that includes all of our premium plugins in one package. Enjoy lifetime updates and lifetime support. Save significantly compared to buying plugins individually.

What’s included

  • SleekAI

  • SleekByte

  • SleekMotion

  • SleekPixel

  • SleekRank

  • SleekView