No. Loglines, status, and short excerpts are public, but the bot gates full scripts behind a rep email exchange or an explicit access request. This protects the writer's leverage and ensures every full read goes through the rep, which is how meaningful relationships happen anyway. The bot makes the gating polite and explicit rather than awkward.

It uses the writer's published essays as voice reference but explicitly paraphrases and links to the original rather than generating sentences as if the writer wrote them. This is deliberate. Writers care a lot about their voice, and the bot is configured to be a researcher rather than an impostor. Most producers prefer this pattern because it feels respectful of the writer's voice.

Yes. Each script has a status field (available, optioned, in development, produced, no longer available). The bot quotes status accurately so producers aren't sent on a wild goose chase requesting a script that's already with another producer. For optioned material, the bot can offer a similar available sample in the same genre or note when the option lapses.

No. Meetings always route through the rep. The bot collects the producer's project context, the writer's relevance to the project, and the rep contact, then either emails the rep directly or hands the producer the rep's contact info with a structured intro draft. This preserves the rep's gatekeeping role while making the producer's path shorter and more respectful.

Carefully. Union membership (WGA) is public and the bot states it cleanly. Quote questions and rate band questions route to the rep, since those negotiations have too much project context to commit to in chat. The bot can confirm the writer is open to assignments and route the specific terms conversation to the rep with the producer's project context attached.

Yes, if you tag work geography in WordPress. The bot can answer whether the writer takes UK series commissions or German feature collaborations and routes those producers to the appropriate rep (US, UK, or European). For writers without international representation, the bot says so cleanly and routes to the writer's US rep with a note about cross-border needs.

NDA work stays hidden by default. The bot can reference the existence of NDA work in general terms ("the writer has been in development on a limited series with a major streamer") if you've configured those generic descriptions, but specifics stay private. Pitch decks are typically not exposed at all on the public site, the bot only routes them via the rep on a per-request basis.

OpenAI, Anthropic, Google Gemini, and OpenRouter are all supported. For writer portfolio conversations where voice nuance and industry vocabulary matter, Claude Sonnet and GPT-4 class models handle the precision better than cheaper models. The per-conversation cost is negligible compared to the value of a single well-routed meeting or assignment lead.