Fluent Forms Conversational Pro changes how a form renders (one question at a time, full-page) but storage stays in the same Fluent Forms tables: fluentform_submissions for completed entries, fluentform_form_meta for partials when the resume-feature is enabled. The default entries screen treats them like any other Fluent Forms submission.

SleekView reads fluentform_submissions and filters to your conversational form IDs. Pivot per-question responses (stored serialized in the response column) into named columns. Add status, created_at, and any tracking meta from fluentform_submission_meta for marketing-grade tables.

Partial submissions, where Conversational's save-and-continue feature is on, sit in a separate flow; SleekView can expose them as a related view. Inline edits route through Fluent Forms' submission APIs.

Conversational forms perform better in completion rate because they ask one question at a time and remove the wall-of-fields feeling. The Fluent Forms team built Conversational Pro to make that easy, and they did it without forking the storage layer, which is the right architectural call. Completed submissions land in the same fluentform_submissions table as classic forms, with the same JSON-encoded response payload.

That uniformity is also the operational ceiling: the default entries screen treats every submission identically, regardless of how it was rendered, which means conversational funnels share a UI with everything else. Teams running multiple conversational funnels (lead qualifiers, onboarding flows, support intake) want to compare completion volumes, slice responses by UTM source, and triage leads in funnel-scoped inboxes. None of that requires changing the storage; all of it requires a UI that pivots the JSON, scopes to form IDs, and saves views.

That's what SleekView does.