No, and the system prompt forbids it. The bot describes what your published policy says and points to the exact clause. It does not interpret obligations under GDPR or CCPA, does not advise visitors on their rights against third parties, and defers to your DPO for anything that looks like a formal subject access or deletion request. That boundary is important: a chatbot improvising legal claims on a privacy page is a liability rather than an asset.

SleekAI reads your privacy policy as a WordPress post or page on every request. Edit the policy in the WordPress editor, save, and the next chat reflects the new wording. No re-indexing or upload step. We recommend versioning the policy via WordPress revisions so you can audit what the bot was reading at any given date, which matters if a regulator ever asks.

Yes. Use display conditions to scope a bot to EU traffic and load the GDPR-framed version of your policy as the source. The system prompt can reference Article 15 (access), Article 17 (erasure), and Article 21 (objection) by name when relevant. For California visitors, scope another bot to your CCPA notice. Multibot makes this configuration rather than custom development.

Transcripts are stored in your WordPress database alongside the user IP, user agent, model used, and token count. You control retention via the standard plugin settings or a small custom cleanup hook. Because chat data may itself contain personal data, we recommend documenting the bot in your own privacy policy and aligning chat-log retention with the rest of your customer data lifecycle.

Whatever the bot sends as prompt or context is processed by the model provider you bring (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or OpenRouter). Under their standard API terms, content is not used for model training by default for paid API accounts. We recommend listing the model provider in your privacy policy as a sub-processor and linking to their DPA, exactly as you would for Stripe or any other data processor.

No. The bot can collect the request - email address, type of request, any specifics - and forward it to your DPO inbox, but it should not execute deletions or exports itself. Subject access workflows require identity verification, scope checks across systems, and a logged response within 30 days. That belongs in a human-reviewed workflow, not a chat reply.

It complements them rather than replacing them. A cookie banner handles the consent capture for regulatory compliance. SleekAI then helps visitors who click 'learn more' to actually understand what each category does and which third parties get the cookie. The bot can quote from your cookie policy page and link back to the consent settings panel.

If the chat widget loads conditionally and stores conversation context, it can count as a non-essential cookie or local storage entry under GDPR and ePrivacy. We recommend treating the widget as you would a live chat tool: document it in your cookie policy, scope to post-consent loading where required, and respect 'reject all' by not initialising the conversation history until the visitor opts in or starts a chat.