✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount

SleekView Kanban for Hotjar UX Reviews

SleekView Kanban reads pages targeted by the Hotjar WordPress plugin for heatmaps and recordings, joins each one with its post, and groups pages by a UX review state. Drag a card from New into In review to track the UX feedback loop without leaving wp-admin.

♾️ Lifetime License available

SleekView Kanban board for Hotjar

Why Hotjar review pages fit a kanban

Hotjar is a user behavior analytics service that captures heatmaps, scroll maps, click maps, and visitor session recordings on the pages you target. The WordPress plugin embeds the Hotjar script and lets you choose which post types and pages should be tracked for heatmaps or recordings, with target rules stored as a post meta key on each included post. The actual heatmap and recording data lives in the Hotjar web app, but the targeting decisions live on the WordPress side.

The default Hotjar plugin admin screen shows a flat sortable list of pages opted into heatmap or recording capture, with no visual sense of which pages a UX team is currently reviewing, which already had a fix shipped, and which ones are still waiting for someone to open the recording in the Hotjar dashboard. The result is targeted pages piling up without anyone reviewing the data the script is collecting on them.

SleekView Kanban points at the post type opted into Hotjar tracking, groups rows by a meta key like ux_review_state, and renders one lane per value. Each card surfaces the Hotjar tracking type, the date the target was added, and the user who flagged it. Dragging a card from New into In review or Fixed writes the new value through update_post_meta, fires save hooks, and turns the Hotjar opt-in list into a real UX review pipeline.

Workflow

From Hotjar opt-in list to UX kanban

1

Pick the tracked post type

Install SleekView and pick the post type opted into Hotjar tracking as the source. SleekView reads every post that carries the Hotjar opt-in meta, with the tracking type and the date the page was added to the queue.
2

Pick UX state as the lane

Set the group-by field to a meta key like ux_review_state. SleekView reads every value present and renders one lane per value, with the live count and color you assign per UX stage.
3

Pick card details to show

Choose which fields appear on the card front. Most UX teams pick the Hotjar tracking type, the date the page was opted in, the user who flagged it, and a short notes meta written when the page entered the queue.
4

Enable drag-and-drop review

Flip drag-and-drop on and SleekView writes the UX review state through update_post_meta. Capabilities decide who can drop into Fixed, so analysts mark In review while engineering confirms the fix is live.

Sample board

Sample Hotjar UX review board for the team

A SleekView Kanban grouping Hotjar tracked pages by UX review state, with cards showing the tracking type, the date the page was opted in, and the user who flagged it.
New
18
Heatmap target on harbor co landing
added today by analyst Anna
Heatmap target on summer summit page
added yesterday by Sam now
Recording target on studio thirty page
added 2d ago by Lead Anna
In review
7
Heatmap reviewed for coach matching
owner analyst Anna day 1 today
Recording reviewed for event planning
owner Sam day 2 of UX review
Heatmap reviewed for recipe series go
owner analyst Anna week 2
Fix proposed
4
Fix proposed for harbor co landing
proposed by Lead Anna today
Fix proposed for summer summit page
proposed by editor Sam day 1
Fix proposed for studio thirty page
proposed by Lead Anna this week
Fixed
92
Fixed landing for harbor co west site
shipped 5 days ago by Anna
Fixed page for summer summit recap
shipped 7 days ago by Sam now
Fixed review for studio thirty page
shipped 2 days ago by Anna

Comparison

Default Hotjar opt-in vs SleekView Kanban

Default Hotjar opt-in list

  • Hotjar opt-in admin renders pages as a flat list with no UX review state on them
  • UX teams have no place to mark a page as in review or with a fix already shipped
  • Tracking heatmap reviews across a sprint requires a separate spreadsheet outside
  • No bulk advance across a list of opted-in pages from the Hotjar plugin admin UI
  • Fixed pages mix with new opt-ins in the same sorted opt-in list across the queue

SleekView Kanban

  • Reads Hotjar opt-in meta on each post so the board mirrors the active capture queue
  • Groups tracked pages by any post meta key with live lane counts per UX review state
  • Drag a card to advance through update_post_meta on a chosen meta key safely
  • Tracking type, opt-in date, and the flagging user render directly on each card
  • Capability gates restrict the Fixed lane to senior UX and engineering lead roles

Features

What SleekView Kanban gives you for Hotjar

UX review queue as lanes

Hotjar opt-in lists tell you what is being captured but nothing about who is reviewing it. SleekView turns the queue into lanes by UX review state, so analysts see what is new, in review, proposed, and already fixed at a glance.

Drag updates review state

Each card move calls update_post_meta on the chosen UX review state key. WordPress save hooks fire on every drop, so notification plugins, audit logs, and UX workflow tools continue to run on every drop.

Filter by tracking type

A filter bar narrows lanes by Hotjar tracking type, opt-in user, date range, or any post meta. Saved filters are per-user, so a heatmap analyst works one slice while a recording analyst works a different scope.

Audience

Teams running a Hotjar review loop

UX analysts and researchers

Analysts watch the New lane each day, open heatmaps and recordings for pages in In review, and drag them to Fix proposed when there is a clear improvement to ship.

Frontend engineers

Engineers filter the board to Fix proposed, ship the change, and drag the card to Fixed once production confirms the new interface is live and tracked by the next Hotjar capture period.

Product managers in product

Product managers filter by date range and category, see how many UX fixes shipped this quarter, and surface stuck pages stalled in Fix proposed during a weekly product sync.

The bigger picture

Why a kanban beats a Hotjar opt-in list

UX analytics is only useful when the recordings turn into fixes. Hotjar captures incredible amounts of user behavior data, but the WordPress plugin's opt-in admin only tells you which pages the script is currently tracking, not which ones a UX team has actually reviewed and shipped a fix for. The result is a growing list of heatmap and recording targets that nobody is ever opening in the Hotjar dashboard, with the team losing track of which interfaces have already been improved and which ones still need attention.

A kanban board fixes that shape. The opt-in list becomes the source of cards, lanes capture the UX review state, and drag-and-drop turns a review decision into a gesture that calls update_post_meta and fires the WordPress save hooks. Fix proposed becomes a clear handoff lane to engineering, Fixed becomes the audit trail of every UX win the team shipped, and the New lane stays short because pages do not pile up unreviewed.

Questions

Common questions about SleekView Kanban for Hotjar

SleekView reads and writes WordPress post meta on the posts opted into Hotjar tracking. It does not call the Hotjar web app API. The Hotjar heatmaps and recordings continue to live in the Hotjar dashboard, and the kanban tracks the WordPress review workflow on top of them.

 

Yes. The card front can include a direct link to the Hotjar dashboard page for the URL using a URL pattern you configure on the board. The link opens the right heatmap or recording so an analyst goes from card to data in one click during a review.

 

Dragging only updates the chosen post meta key through update_post_meta. The Hotjar opt-in meta stays exactly as the Hotjar plugin wrote it, so the page continues to be tracked by the Hotjar script while your UX review state advances on top of it.

 

Yes. SleekView supports per-user filters on any post meta or post author key, so each analyst sees only the pages where their user ID matches an owner meta value. The same board configuration powers every analyst view and leads see the unfiltered version.

 

If the Hotjar opt-in meta is removed from the post, the row disappears from the board on the next page load because the source query filters by that meta key. The post itself stays in WordPress and the post meta history is preserved for any later audit work.

 

Yes. Rows with no value for the lane meta key fall into the configured default lane, usually New. As soon as someone drops a card into another lane the value is written, and the card moves accordingly on every subsequent page load for the UX team.

 

Yes. The board can show every Hotjar opt-in regardless of type, with the tracking type visible on each card. Filter the board by tracking type if you want one board for heatmaps and another for recordings, or keep them in one view for a small UX team.

 

SleekView reads and writes the existing WordPress post tables and Hotjar opt-in post meta without adding shadow tables for UX data. View configuration sits in a small options row, so uninstalling leaves every Hotjar opt-in and post meta exactly where it was on save.

 

Pricing

More than 1000+
happy customers

Explore our flexible licensing options tailored to your needs. Upgrade your license anytime to access more features, or opt for a lifetime license for ongoing value, including lifetime updates and lifetime support. Our hassle-free upgrade process ensures that our platform can grow with you, starting from whichever plan you choose.

Starter

€79

EUR

per year

  • 3 websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Pro

€149

EUR

per year

  • Unlimited websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Lifetime ♾️

Most popular

€249

EUR

once

  • Unlimited websites
  • Lifetime updates
  • Lifetime support

...or get the Bundle Deal
and save €250 🎁

The Bundle (unlimited sites)

Pay once, own it forever

Elevate your WordPress site with our exclusive plugin bundle that includes all of our premium plugins in one package. Enjoy lifetime updates and lifetime support. Save significantly compared to buying plugins individually.

What’s included

  • SleekAI

  • SleekByte

  • SleekMotion

  • SleekPixel

  • SleekRank

  • SleekView