✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount
✨ New Plugin Alert ✨ SleekRank is now available with €50 launch discount

SleekView Kanban for Site Reviews

SleekView reads every Site Reviews submission, groups them by approval state, and lets moderators drag cards between Pending, Approved, Unapproved, and Trash so the underlying site_review post updates immediately with full hook coverage.

♾️ Lifetime License available

SleekView Kanban board for Site Reviews

Why review moderation belongs on a board

Site Reviews stores each submission as a site_review custom post type with structured ratings and content in related tables. Each record carries a post_status, typically pending or publish, plus an is_approved meta flag the plugin uses to gate frontend display. The default review list screen shows everything as a paginated list, which works for a small site but breaks down once a busy store collects dozens of submissions a day across many products.

SleekView Kanban reads the same site_review rows you would query with WP_Query or the Site Reviews API. Pick post_status as the group column and every submission becomes a card grouped under its current state. Cards can show the reviewer name, the star rating, the assigned product or page, the snippet of text, and the submission date so moderators see the full context before deciding to approve or reject.

Dragging a card from Pending to Approved triggers the same Site Reviews approval flow the admin edit screen uses, which fires site-reviews/review/approved for analytics and automation, updates the assigned post's aggregate rating, and pushes the review to the live frontend. Spam goes straight to Trash, borderline submissions sit in Unapproved while a senior moderator weighs in, and the underlying database stays in sync with what your team is actually doing.

Workflow

Connect Site Reviews to a moderation board

1

Connect the Site Reviews source

SleekView reads the site_review custom post type using the same query Site Reviews exposes. Add filters for assigned post, rating range, or submission date so the board scopes to today's pending reviews on your top-selling product, not every submission ever.
2

Pick the approval status column

Choose post_status as the group field for the standard four-column moderation board. You can also group by rating to triage one-star submissions first, or by assigned post to see all reviews for a specific product clustered together.
3

Choose what each review card shows

Map fields onto the card front. Common setups show reviewer name, star rating as a glyph or number, assigned post title, the first 60 characters of the review content, and the submission date so moderators decide without opening detail.
4

Enable drag-and-drop approval changes

Turn on writeback and dragging a card calls the same Site Reviews approval API as the admin edit screen. Aggregate ratings recalculate on the assigned post, frontend caches refresh, and any analytics hook listening for review approvals fires normally.

Sample board

Sample Site Reviews moderation board

The native Site Reviews approval states with realistic submissions, star ratings, and assigned products showing how a moderator clears a queue in a few minutes.
Pending
23
5 star review for noise-cancelling headphones
Anna Becker, posted 2 hours ago
3 star review mentions shipping delay
Tom Reilly, posted today
1 star review needs sentiment check
Yuki Sato, posted yesterday
Approved
812
5 star review on flagship leather backpack
Marco Greco, approved Monday
4 star review highlights packaging
Priya Patel, approved last week
5 star review on annual coffee subscription
Hugo Berg, approved today
Unapproved
12
2 star review flagged for profanity
Anonymous, requires manual edit
1 star review pending vendor response
Lisa Brandt, on hold for reply
Off topic review needs reassignment
Diego Ruiz, on hold for review
Trash
44
Promotional spam blocked by Akismet
Spam bot, trashed today
Duplicate review from same IP address
Anonymous, trashed yesterday
Off topic political comment removed
Anonymous, trashed last week

Comparison

Default Site Reviews screen vs SleekView Kanban

Default Site Reviews list

  • Flat paginated list of every submission, with status as a small column label
  • Bulk approvals require checkbox selection across paginated screens of pending reviews
  • No visual sense of how many one-star reviews are clustering on a single product
  • Reviewing rating, assigned post, and excerpt requires opening each submission edit page
  • Filtering by status reloads the whole admin instead of showing parallel queues

SleekView Kanban

  • Reads from the site_review custom post type and the Site Reviews ratings table
  • Drag a card to fire the same approval flow as the Site Reviews admin edit screen
  • Cards show reviewer name, star rating, assigned post, excerpt, and submission date
  • Group by rating instead of status to triage one-star clusters as their own column
  • Capability checks honor edit_others_posts so junior moderators stay scoped

Features

What SleekView Kanban gives you for Site Reviews

Native review approval engine

Every column maps to a real Site Reviews state. Approvals trigger aggregate rating recalculation on the assigned post, frontend cache flushes, and the same hooks Site Reviews exposes for analytics, schema, or notification integrations. The plugin remains the source of truth at all times.

Drag with moderator audit trail

Every move writes a note onto the review using Site Reviews's existing notes API, recording the moderator's display name, the source column, and the destination column. Disputes about why a review was approved or rejected have a permanent timeline attached to each record.

Saved boards per product or rating

Pin a board to a specific product, category, or rating range. Moderators can run a board scoped to one-star submissions, the founder can watch the highest-trafficked product, and the support lead can clear yesterday's queue without disturbing anyone else's view.

Audience

Where a Site Reviews kanban changes moderation

Daily moderation queue

The Pending column is a clear morning task list. Moderators read, drag genuine submissions to Approved, send promotional content to Trash, and the aggregate rating on each product updates the moment the card lands in its new column.

Negative review escalation

Group by rating and the one-star column surfaces every problem. Support drags reviews into Unapproved while contacting the customer, then moves them to Approved with a public reply or to Trash if the complaint resolves through a refund.

Featured testimonial selection

Filter the Approved column to five-star reviews above a content length threshold. Marketing drags the best candidates into a Featured board where they become hero quotes on the homepage and product pages without manual exports.

The bigger picture

Why moderation needs a workflow view

User-submitted reviews shape conversion more than almost any other element on a product page, which means the moderation queue is part of the marketing funnel whether the team treats it that way or not. The default Site Reviews list screen is built around per-record editing, not throughput, so a moderator working through 40 submissions a day clicks open detail screen after detail screen, judges each in isolation, and loses track of patterns. One product collecting four one-star reviews in a single morning is a problem worth a phone call, but on a flat list those four cards look the same as any other four.

A kanban view aggregates the same data into a shape the brain can read. Pending becomes a tangible queue with a clear count. One-star clusters become visible the moment they form.

Spam submissions get a permanent home in Trash where they cannot pollute the main view. The data and the writeback both stay with Site Reviews. The moderation interface finally matches the rhythm of the work, which makes the difference between a team that clears the queue daily and a team that lets it grow into a problem nobody owns.

Questions

Common questions about SleekView Kanban for Site Reviews

Yes. Site Reviews supports assigned posts of any post type, so the board treats general site reviews and product-assigned reviews the same way. You can filter by assigned post type, by specific post ID, or include everything in a unified moderation queue depending on how your team divides the work.

 

Yes. Dragging a card to Approved fires the same internal hook the admin edit screen uses, which triggers Site Reviews's rating recalculation on the assigned post. Schema markup, average rating shortcodes, and any custom rating widgets all reflect the new value the moment the card lands.

 

Yes. Site Reviews supports per-attribute ratings if your form is configured that way. Cards can display the overall star rating plus a comma-separated list of per-attribute scores, so moderators see at a glance whether shipping or product quality is driving the rating up or down.

 

Yes. Every drag runs through current_user_can with the configured moderation capability, which by default is edit_others_posts. Unauthorized users can drag for personal sorting only, the underlying status does not change, and the card snaps back to its original column with a toast.

 

Filters apply at the database query level. A typical moderation board shows the last 30 days of pending and recently approved submissions, while older reviews remain queryable in dedicated archive boards. Render counts stay manageable even on sites with years of accumulated review history.

 

Yes. The approval flow goes through the same code path as the admin edit screen. Reviewer notification emails, admin notifications, Slack and Pushover integrations from add-ons, and any custom action listening for site-reviews/review/approved all fire exactly as they would after a manual click.

 

Yes. The group column is configurable per board. Grouping by rating creates one column per star value, which is useful when triaging negative reviews or when curating five-star content for marketing. The drag behavior is the same and writeback still updates the approval status correctly.

 

Yes. Every drag writes a note onto the site_review record naming the moderator, the source column, the destination column, and the timestamp. The note appears next to existing Site Reviews notes on the detail view and in any export that already pulls structured notes.

 

Pricing

More than 1000+
happy customers

Explore our flexible licensing options tailored to your needs. Upgrade your license anytime to access more features, or opt for a lifetime license for ongoing value, including lifetime updates and lifetime support. Our hassle-free upgrade process ensures that our platform can grow with you, starting from whichever plan you choose.

Starter

€79

EUR

per year

  • 3 websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Pro

€149

EUR

per year

  • Unlimited websites
  • 1 year of updates
  • 1 year of support

Lifetime ♾️

Most popular

€249

EUR

once

  • Unlimited websites
  • Lifetime updates
  • Lifetime support

...or get the Bundle Deal
and save €250 🎁

The Bundle (unlimited sites)

Pay once, own it forever

Elevate your WordPress site with our exclusive plugin bundle that includes all of our premium plugins in one package. Enjoy lifetime updates and lifetime support. Save significantly compared to buying plugins individually.

What’s included

  • SleekAI

  • SleekByte

  • SleekMotion

  • SleekPixel

  • SleekRank

  • SleekView